PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSED.L vs. MEUD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSED.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MSED.L having a 6.29% return and MEUD.L slightly higher at 6.58%. Over the past 10 years, MSED.L has underperformed MEUD.L with an annualized return of 3.19%, while MEUD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.28% annualized return.


MSED.L

1D
0.71%
1M
1.87%
YTD
6.29%
6M
7.61%
1Y
18.75%
3Y*
-10.77%
5Y*
-4.44%
10Y*
3.19%

MEUD.L

1D
0.58%
1M
0.74%
YTD
6.58%
6M
8.94%
1Y
19.30%
3Y*
14.05%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
10.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSED.L vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSED.L
Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C
6.29%27.95%6.38%-45.01%-3.26%15.48%3.29%21.79%-10.43%14.38%
MEUD.L
Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc
6.58%26.51%3.65%13.48%-5.04%17.06%3.85%20.40%-9.59%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between MSED.L and MEUD.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2013

0.95

The correlation between MSED.L and MEUD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

MSED.L vs. MEUD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSED.L
MEUD.L

Financial Services

25.6%
24.0%

Industrials

22.2%
20.1%

Technology

18.6%
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
6.9%

Healthcare

5.4%
12.7%

Energy

5.2%
5.5%

Utilities

4.7%
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
7.7%

Communication Services

2.5%
3.1%

Basic Materials

1.7%
5.0%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Financial Services

MSED.L
25.6%
MEUD.L
24.0%

Industrials

MSED.L
22.2%
MEUD.L
20.1%

Technology

MSED.L
18.6%
MEUD.L
9.4%

Consumer Cyclical

MSED.L
10.1%
MEUD.L
6.9%

Healthcare

MSED.L
5.4%
MEUD.L
12.7%

Energy

MSED.L
5.2%
MEUD.L
5.5%

Utilities

MSED.L
4.7%
MEUD.L
4.5%

Consumer Defensive

MSED.L
4.0%
MEUD.L
7.7%

Communication Services

MSED.L
2.5%
MEUD.L
3.1%

Basic Materials

MSED.L
1.7%
MEUD.L
5.0%

Real Estate

MSED.L

-

MEUD.L
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSED.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSED.L
MSED.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MSED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MSED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

MEUD.L
MEUD.L Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEUD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSED.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSED.LMEUD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

1.85

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

6.70

-1.14

MSED.L vs. MEUD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSED.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the MEUD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSED.L and MEUD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSED.LMEUD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

1.60

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.71

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

0.69

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.60

-0.46

Drawdowns

MSED.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSED.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than MEUD.L's maximum drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSED.L and MEUD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSED.LMEUD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.05%

-28.57%

-29.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.44%

-10.53%

-0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.05%

-12.61%

-45.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.05%

-17.09%

-40.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.05%

-28.57%

-29.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.68%

-1.33%

-30.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.22%

-4.16%

-10.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.39%

2.91%

+0.48%

Volatility

MSED.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) at 4.14%. This indicates that MSED.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSED.LMEUD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

4.14%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

10.20%

+2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.02%

12.14%

+2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.62%

13.94%

+15.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.74%

14.92%

+9.82%

MSED.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSED.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MSED.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSED.L nor MEUD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, MSED.L and MEUD.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, MSED.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSED.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MEUD.L.

MSED.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for MSED.L and 0.15% for MEUD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSED.L and MEUD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer