PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSED.L vs. LCPE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSED.L vs. LCPE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSED.L achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than LCPE.L's 14.20% return. Over the past 10 years, MSED.L has underperformed LCPE.L with an annualized return of 3.11%, while LCPE.L has yielded a comparatively higher 10.02% annualized return.


MSED.L

1D
-0.61%
1M
1.23%
YTD
5.69%
6M
6.73%
1Y
18.03%
3Y*
-10.94%
5Y*
-4.55%
10Y*
3.11%

LCPE.L

1D
0.39%
1M
0.50%
YTD
14.20%
6M
14.69%
1Y
27.61%
3Y*
11.83%
5Y*
8.75%
10Y*
10.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSED.L vs. LCPE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSED.L
Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C
5.69%27.89%6.38%-45.01%-3.26%15.48%3.29%21.79%-11.28%15.48%
LCPE.L
Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS
14.20%18.27%-2.33%10.46%-0.17%17.51%8.55%16.87%-6.17%9.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MSED.L and LCPE.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2015

0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between MSED.L and LCPE.L has dropped to 0.61 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

MSED.L vs. LCPE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MSED.L
LCPE.L

Financial Services

25.6%

-

Industrials

22.2%
0.2%

Technology

18.6%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
1.9%

Healthcare

5.4%
32.6%

Energy

5.2%
0.0%

Utilities

4.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
32.8%

Communication Services

2.5%
0.0%

Basic Materials

1.7%
32.3%

Real Estate

-

0.0%

Financial Services

MSED.L
25.6%
LCPE.L

-

Industrials

MSED.L
22.2%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Technology

MSED.L
18.6%
LCPE.L
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

MSED.L
10.1%
LCPE.L
1.9%

Healthcare

MSED.L
5.4%
LCPE.L
32.6%

Energy

MSED.L
5.2%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Utilities

MSED.L
4.7%
LCPE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

MSED.L
4.0%
LCPE.L
32.8%

Communication Services

MSED.L
2.5%
LCPE.L
0.0%

Basic Materials

MSED.L
1.7%
LCPE.L
32.3%

Real Estate

MSED.L

-

LCPE.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSED.L vs. LCPE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSED.L
MSED.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MSED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MSED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

LCPE.L
LCPE.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCPE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSED.L vs. LCPE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSED.LLCPE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

4.13

-2.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

13.66

-8.46

MSED.L vs. LCPE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSED.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the LCPE.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSED.L and LCPE.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSED.LLCPE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

2.44

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

0.68

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

0.70

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.60

-0.50

Drawdowns

MSED.L vs. LCPE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSED.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than LCPE.L's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSED.L and LCPE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSED.LLCPE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.05%

-27.75%

-30.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-6.66%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-58.05%

-12.39%

-45.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.05%

-12.39%

-45.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.05%

-27.75%

-30.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.10%

-2.71%

-29.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.00%

-3.95%

-12.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

2.02%

+1.44%

Volatility

MSED.L vs. LCPE.L - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and Ossiam Shiller Barclays Cape Europe Sector Value TR UCITS (LCPE.L) have volatilities of 3.91% and 3.81%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSED.LLCPE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.91%

3.81%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.23%

8.48%

+3.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.12%

11.29%

+3.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.91%

12.89%

+21.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.67%

14.29%

+15.38%

MSED.L vs. LCPE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSED.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than LCPE.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSED.L vs. LCPE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSED.L nor LCPE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSED.L and LCPE.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSED.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSED.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LCPE.L.

MSED.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LCPE.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for MSED.L and 0.65% for LCPE.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSED.L and LCPE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer