MSED.L vs. IEDL.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

MSED.L (Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C) and IEDL.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)) are both Europe Equities funds - MSED.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while IEDL.L tracks the MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MSED.L returned -4.55%/yr vs 14.47%/yr for IEDL.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MSED.L charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IEDL.L.

Performance

MSED.L vs. IEDL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

MSED.L is traded in GBp, while IEDL.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IEDL.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSED.L achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than IEDL.L's 12.43% return.

MSED.L

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 5.69%
• 6M: 6.73%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: -10.94%
• 5Y*: -4.55%
• 10Y*: 3.11%

IEDL.L

• 1D: -0.72%
• 1M: 1.85%
• YTD: 12.43%
• 6M: 15.20%
• 1Y: 34.71%
• 3Y*: 21.38%
• 5Y*: 14.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSED.L vs. IEDL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MSED.L Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C	5.69%	27.89%	6.38%	-45.01%	-3.26%	15.48%	3.29%	21.79%	-7.38%
IEDL.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	12.43%	42.19%	5.33%	11.38%	1.15%	19.23%	-3.65%	15.06%	-10.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MSED.L and IEDL.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2018	0.83

The correlation between MSED.L and IEDL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

MSED.L vs. IEDL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MSED.L	IEDL.L
Financial Services	25.6%	22.6%
Industrials	22.2%	17.0%
Technology	18.6%	12.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	6.2%
Healthcare	5.4%	12.3%
Energy	5.2%	5.1%
Utilities	4.7%	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.0%	8.6%
Communication Services	2.5%	3.7%
Basic Materials	1.7%	6.2%
Real Estate	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

MSED.L vs. IEDL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSED.L

MSED.L Risk / Return Rank: 36
MSED.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MSED.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
MSED.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
MSED.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
MSED.L Martin Ratio Rank: 37

IEDL.L

IEDL.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
IEDL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
IEDL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
IEDL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IEDL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSED.L vs. IEDL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MSED.L	IEDL.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	2.55	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	3.44	-1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.46	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	3.28	-1.71
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.20	12.14	-6.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MSED.L vs. IEDL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSED.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the IEDL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSED.L and IEDL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MSED.L	IEDL.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.19	2.55	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.13	0.94	-1.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.58	-0.49

Drawdowns

MSED.L vs. IEDL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSED.L drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, which is greater than IEDL.L's maximum drawdown of -34.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSED.L and IEDL.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSED.L	IEDL.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.05%	-34.27%	-23.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.46%	-10.54%	-0.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.05%	-16.31%	-41.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-58.05%	-16.35%	-41.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.05%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.10%	-1.50%	-30.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.00%	-5.73%	-10.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	2.85%	+0.61%

Volatility

MSED.L vs. IEDL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C (MSED.L) is 3.91%, while iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (IEDL.L) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that MSED.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEDL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSED.L	IEDL.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.91%	4.34%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.23%	11.08%	+1.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.12%	13.54%	+1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.91%	15.34%	+18.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.67%	17.63%	+12.04%

MSED.L vs. IEDL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSED.L has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IEDL.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

MSED.L vs. IEDL.L - Dividend Comparison

MSED.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IEDL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.03%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
IEDL.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Value Factor UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)	3.03%	3.44%	4.22%	4.75%	4.23%	3.55%	2.32%	3.86%	3.19%
MSED.L Lyxor Euro Stoxx 50 DR UCITS C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSED.L and IEDL.L in my portfolio?

MSED.L and IEDL.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MSED.L or IEDL.L?

On fees, MSED.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSED.L or IEDL.L?

MSED.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEDL.L.

What is the main difference between MSED.L and IEDL.L?

MSED.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while IEDL.L tracks MSCI Europe Value NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for MSED.L and 0.25% for IEDL.L.