PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSDD vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSDD vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MSDD having a -47.16% return and SMST slightly lower at -49.49%.


MSDD

1D
13.67%
1M
85.18%
YTD
-47.16%
6M
-24.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMST

1D
13.96%
1M
85.04%
YTD
-49.49%
6M
-27.60%
1Y
73.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSDD vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MSDD and SMST is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025

1.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSDD vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSDD

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSDD vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSDD vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSDDSMSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

-0.52

+1.23

Drawdowns

MSDD vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSDD drawdown since its inception was -84.91%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDD and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSDDSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.91%

-99.25%

+14.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-85.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.67%

-98.02%

+30.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.42%

-90.67%

+61.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.73%

Volatility

MSDD vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSDDSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

37.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

126.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.56%

140.93%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

141.56%

166.79%

-25.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

141.56%

166.79%

-25.23%

MSDD vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSDD has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSDD vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSDD nor SMST has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MSDD and SMST move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SMST is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SMST is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MSDD.

MSDD and SMST have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MSDD and 1.29% for SMST.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSDD and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer