MSDD vs. MULL

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

MSDD (GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF) and MULL (GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MSDD is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while MULL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MSDD returned 151.71% vs 2882.24% for MULL. At a correlation of -0.23, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 1.50% expense ratio.

Performance

MSDD vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSDD achieves a -48.72% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 619.42% return.

MSDD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.02%
• 6M: -43.28%
• YTD: -48.72%
• 1Y: 151.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MULL

• 1D: -2.53%
• 1M: -10.77%
• 6M: 404.87%
• YTD: 619.42%
• 1Y: 2,882.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSDD vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MSDD GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF	-48.72%	274.52%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	619.42%	410.41%

Correlation

The correlation between MSDD and MULL is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.24
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025	-0.23

Return for Risk

MSDD vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSDD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MULL

MULL Risk / Return Rank: 98
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSDD vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MSDD	MULL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.55	19.64	-19.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	5.18	-3.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.66	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.92	56.18	-55.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.81	173.42	-171.61

MSDD vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSDD Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 19.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSDD and MULL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MSDD vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSDD drawdown since its inception was -84.91%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSDD and MULL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MSDD	MULL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-84.91%	-72.29%	-12.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-84.91%	-53.09%	-31.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.63%	-39.88%	-28.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.40%	-20.78%	-10.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.10%	17.16%	+25.94%

Volatility

MSDD vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF (MSDD) is 32.11%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 68.08%. This indicates that MSDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MSDD	MULL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.11%	68.08%	-35.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	124.37%	124.42%	-0.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	140.94%	151.84%	-10.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	138.59%	144.77%	-6.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	138.59%	144.77%	-6.18%

MSDD vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MSDD and MULL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.

Dividends

MSDD vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

MSDD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.

Position	TTM	2025
MSDD GraniteShares 2x Short MSTR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%
MULL GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF	0.05%	0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MSDD and MULL in my portfolio?

MSDD and MULL have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MSDD or MULL?

MULL has higher volatility (68.08%) compared to MSDD (32.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSDD dropped -84.91% vs MULL's -72.29%.

Which ETF is better, MSDD or MULL?

On 1-year performance, MULL leads with 2882.24% vs 151.71% for MSDD. Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. On volatility, MSDD has been the lower-risk option at 32.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MSDD or MULL?

Over the 1-year period, MULL has performed better with a 2882.24% return vs 151.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MSDD or MULL?

MSDD and MULL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MSDD or MULL?

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.05%, compared with 0.00% for MSDD.

What is the main difference between MSDD and MULL?

MSDD is categorized as Inverse Equities, while MULL is Leveraged Equities.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MULL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.64 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.