PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSCI vs. CTAS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MSCI vs. CTAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MSCI Inc. (MSCI) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSCI achieves a 5.22% return, which is significantly higher than CTAS's -5.80% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MSCI having a 24.54% annualized return and CTAS not far behind at 23.61%.


MSCI

1D
0.81%
1M
6.66%
YTD
5.22%
6M
9.54%
1Y
11.93%
3Y*
9.01%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
24.54%

CTAS

1D
-3.08%
1M
4.74%
YTD
-5.80%
6M
-5.53%
1Y
-19.83%
3Y*
14.43%
5Y*
15.92%
10Y*
23.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSCI vs. CTAS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSCI
MSCI Inc.
5.22%-3.17%7.31%22.90%-23.34%38.14%74.38%77.19%17.95%62.63%
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
-5.80%3.78%22.24%34.82%2.97%26.51%32.74%61.73%9.04%36.32%

Correlation

The correlation between MSCI and CTAS is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 15, 2007

0.50

The correlation between MSCI and CTAS shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MSCI:

$43.98B

CTAS:

$71.72B

EPS

MSCI:

$17.28

CTAS:

$4.75

PE Ratio

MSCI:

34.67

CTAS:

37.08

PEG Ratio

MSCI:

2.15

CTAS:

2.60

PS Ratio

MSCI:

14.12

CTAS:

6.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

MSCI:

$3.24B

CTAS:

$11.03B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MSCI:

$2.68B

CTAS:

$1.33B

EBITDA (TTM)

MSCI:

$1.99B

CTAS:

$2.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSCI vs. CTAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSCI
MSCI Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
MSCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSCI Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MSCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSCI Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CTAS
CTAS Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
CTAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTAS Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
CTAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTAS Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSCI vs. CTAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MSCI Inc. (MSCI) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSCICTASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

0.84

+0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

-0.75

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.37

-1.31

+2.67

MSCI vs. CTAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is higher than the CTAS Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSCI and CTAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSCI vs. CTAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSCI drawdown since its inception was -69.06%, which is greater than CTAS's maximum drawdown of -65.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSCI and CTAS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSCICTASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.06%

-65.32%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.07%

-27.23%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.99%

-27.68%

+1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.74%

-27.68%

-16.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.74%

-48.38%

+4.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.94%

-21.83%

+14.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.07%

-15.04%

+1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.92%

15.61%

-8.69%

Volatility

MSCI vs. CTAS - Volatility Comparison

MSCI Inc. (MSCI) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS) have volatilities of 8.37% and 8.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSCICTASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.37%

8.54%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.91%

15.74%

+5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.70%

20.40%

+8.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.72%

22.60%

+8.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.18%

26.70%

+4.48%

Dividends

MSCI vs. CTAS - Dividend Comparison

MSCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.29%, more than CTAS's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CTAS
Cintas Corporation
1.02%0.89%0.80%0.83%0.93%0.77%0.99%0.95%1.22%1.04%1.15%1.15%
MSCI
MSCI Inc.
1.29%1.25%1.07%0.98%0.98%0.59%0.65%0.98%1.30%1.04%1.27%1.11%

Financials

MSCI vs. CTAS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MSCI Inc. and Cintas Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
850.80M
2.84B
(MSCI) Total Revenue
(CTAS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MSCI vs. CTAS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between MSCI Inc. and Cintas Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
83.3%
-97.8%
Portfolio components
MSCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSCI Inc. reported a gross profit of 709.00M and revenue of 850.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 83.3%.

CTAS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a gross profit of -2.78B and revenue of 2.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -97.8%.

MSCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSCI Inc. reported an operating income of 456.90M and revenue of 850.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 53.7%.

CTAS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported an operating income of 659.90M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.2%.

MSCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MSCI Inc. reported a net income of 406.00M and revenue of 850.80M, resulting in a net margin of 47.7%.

CTAS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cintas Corporation reported a net income of 502.50M and revenue of 2.84B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MSCI and CTAS have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTAS has higher volatility (8.54%) compared to MSCI (8.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSCI dropped -69.06% vs CTAS's -65.32%.

MSCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.33 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSCI and CTAS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer