MSBT vs. BITC
MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) and BITC (Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. MSBT is passively managed, while BITC is actively managed. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MSBT charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for BITC.
Performance
MSBT vs. BITC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSBT
- 1D
- -2.96%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
BITC
- 1D
- -2.97%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- 6M
- -1.00%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 1Y
- -24.54%
- 3Y*
- 29.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 26.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $51.18K | $64.98K | $91.15K | |
| $6.64M | $6.25M | $10.51M |
MSBT vs. BITC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -13.37% |
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | -1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSBT and BITC is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSBT vs. BITC — Risk / Return Rank
MSBT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BITC
MSBT vs. BITC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF (BITC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSBT | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.80 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.89 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSBT vs. BITC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSBT drawdown since its inception was -28.33%, smaller than the maximum BITC drawdown of -38.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBT and BITC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSBT | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.33% | -38.51% | +10.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -27.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -38.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.35% | -32.48% | +9.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.41% | -16.98% | +3.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 20.72% | — |
Volatility
MSBT vs. BITC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSBT | BITC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.07% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.32% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.47% | 25.11% | +10.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 45.81% | -10.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.47% | 45.81% | -10.34% |
MSBT vs. BITC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSBT has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BITC's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSBT vs. BITC - Dividend Comparison
MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BITC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BITC Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF | 3.42% | 3.36% | 42.68% | 5.82% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSBT and BITC have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for BITC.
BITC has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.
They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Bitwise. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for MSBT and 0.88% for BITC.
Find the right allocation for MSBT and BITC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer