MSBT vs. BCDF
MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) and BCDF (Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. MSBT is passively managed, while BCDF is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSBT charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for BCDF.
Performance
MSBT vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MSBT
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -22.16%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCDF
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 6M
- 2.87%
- 1Y
- 6.42%
- 3Y*
- 15.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -10.94% |
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | -1.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSBT and BCDF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSBT vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank
MSBT
BCDF
MSBT vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSBT | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.58 | 0.39 | -1.98 |
Drawdowns
MSBT vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSBT drawdown since its inception was -22.46%, smaller than the maximum BCDF drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSBT and BCDF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSBT | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.46% | -27.70% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.46% | -7.53% | -14.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -9.83% | +5.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility
MSBT vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSBT | BCDF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.13% | 14.75% | +18.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 16.94% | +16.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.13% | 16.94% | +16.19% |
MSBT vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSBT has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSBT vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison
MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BCDF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCDF Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF | 2.44% | 2.53% | 1.63% | 0.69% | 0.38% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSBT and BCDF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for BCDF.
BCDF has the higher dividend yield at 2.44%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.
They also come from different issuers: Morgan Stanley and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for MSBT and 0.85% for BCDF.
Find the right allocation for MSBT and BCDF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer