PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSAU.L vs. HEMC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSAU.L vs. HEMC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MSAU.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

MSAU.L is traded in USD, while HEMC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HEMC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSAU.L achieves a 4.38% return, which is significantly lower than HEMC.L's 17.69% return.


MSAU.L

1D
0.37%
1M
-3.43%
6M
-1.37%
YTD
4.38%
1Y
3.87%
3Y*
-0.20%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.56%

HEMC.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-8.57%
6M
11.90%
YTD
17.69%
1Y
32.52%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSAU.L vs. HEMC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MSAU.L
Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
4.38%-5.73%0.20%10.06%-7.16%
HEMC.L
HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
17.69%34.15%7.08%8.45%-22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between MSAU.L and HEMC.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2022

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSAU.L vs. HEMC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSAU.L
MSAU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
MSAU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSAU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

HEMC.L
HEMC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HEMC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEMC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEMC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HEMC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEMC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSAU.L vs. HEMC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MSAU.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MSAU.LHEMC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.29

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.35

1.18

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.74

2.17

-1.43

MSAU.L vs. HEMC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSAU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is lower than the HEMC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSAU.L and HEMC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MSAU.L vs. HEMC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSAU.L drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, which is greater than HEMC.L's maximum drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAU.L and HEMC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSAU.LHEMC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.92%

-32.92%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.90%

-27.53%

+16.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.03%

-27.53%

+11.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.32%

-10.23%

-8.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.49%

-13.56%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.19%

14.98%

-9.79%

Volatility

MSAU.L vs. HEMC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (MSAU.L) is 2.51%, while HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that MSAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HEMC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSAU.LHEMC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

9.09%

-6.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

19.30%

-8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.34%

45.83%

-30.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.87%

31.60%

-15.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

31.60%

-12.85%

MSAU.L vs. HEMC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSAU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than HEMC.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSAU.L vs. HEMC.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither MSAU.L nor HEMC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MSAU.L and HEMC.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, HEMC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

HEMC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MSAU.L.

MSAU.L tracks MSCI Saudi Arabia 20/35 Capped Index, while HEMC.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MSAU.L and 0.15% for HEMC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSAU.L and HEMC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer