MSAU.L vs. FTWG.L
MSAU.L (Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF) and FTWG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco - MSAU.L tracks the Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF while FTWG.L tracks the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MSAU.L returned -0.44%/yr vs 19.25%/yr for FTWG.L. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MSAU.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FTWG.L.
Performance
MSAU.L vs. FTWG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSAU.L is traded in USD, while FTWG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the FTWG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSAU.L achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than FTWG.L's 11.46% return.
MSAU.L
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- -0.44%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- —
FTWG.L
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 9.89%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 1Y
- 24.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSAU.L vs. FTWG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MSAU.L Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF | 4.13% | -5.73% | 0.20% | 4.35% |
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | 11.46% | 22.73% | 17.92% | -13.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSAU.L and FTWG.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2023 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSAU.L vs. FTWG.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSAU.L
FTWG.L
MSAU.L vs. FTWG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MSAU.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.35 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.32 | 2.62 | -2.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.67 | 10.87 | -10.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MSAU.L vs. FTWG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSAU.L drawdown since its inception was -42.92%, which is greater than FTWG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSAU.L and FTWG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSAU.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.92% | -25.84% | -17.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.90% | -9.20% | -1.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.03% | -16.89% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.51% | -0.85% | -17.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.49% | -6.28% | -8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.15% | 2.22% | +2.93% |
Volatility
MSAU.L vs. FTWG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF (MSAU.L) is 2.49%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist (FTWG.L) has a volatility of 3.43%. This indicates that MSAU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTWG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSAU.L | FTWG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.49% | 3.43% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 9.88% | +1.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.32% | 12.26% | +3.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 17.60% | -1.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 17.60% | +1.16% |
MSAU.L vs. FTWG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
MSAU.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FTWG.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
MSAU.L vs. FTWG.L - Dividend Comparison
MSAU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FTWG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FTWG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Dist | 1.26% | 1.34% | 1.50% | 0.70% |
MSAU.L Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MSAU.L and FTWG.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTWG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTWG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MSAU.L.
MSAU.L tracks Invesco MSCI Saudi Arabia ETF, while FTWG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MSAU.L and 0.15% for FTWG.L.
Find the right allocation for MSAU.L and FTWG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer