PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MSACX vs. PRCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MSACX vs. PRCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MSACX achieves a 17.05% return, which is significantly higher than PRCOX's 12.08% return. Over the past 10 years, MSACX has underperformed PRCOX with an annualized return of 8.95%, while PRCOX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.17% annualized return.


MSACX

1D
0.68%
1M
5.92%
YTD
17.05%
6M
5.92%
1Y
17.93%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
4.86%
10Y*
8.95%

PRCOX

1D
0.28%
1M
5.68%
YTD
12.08%
6M
12.15%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
14.72%
10Y*
16.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MSACX vs. PRCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio
17.05%21.80%7.17%12.50%-21.58%2.26%30.48%22.42%-15.15%24.79%
PRCOX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund
12.08%16.34%26.41%29.82%-18.80%28.06%19.82%33.04%-4.73%23.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MSACX and PRCOX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.63

The correlation between MSACX and PRCOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MSACX vs. PRCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MSACX
MSACX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
MSACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSACX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
MSACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

PRCOX
PRCOX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PRCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
PRCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MSACX vs. PRCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) and T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MSACXPRCOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.90

2.47

-1.57

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.12

3.42

-2.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.44

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

3.16

-1.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.43

14.73

-10.30

MSACX vs. PRCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MSACX Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is lower than the PRCOX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MSACX and PRCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MSACXPRCOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

2.47

-1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.85

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.88

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.57

-0.20

Drawdowns

MSACX vs. PRCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MSACX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, roughly equal to the maximum PRCOX drawdown of -53.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSACX and PRCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MSACXPRCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-53.96%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.85%

-9.32%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-19.39%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.36%

-24.94%

-12.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.36%

-34.42%

-2.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.25%

-9.18%

-3.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.96%

1.99%

+1.97%

Volatility

MSACX vs. PRCOX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio (MSACX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund (PRCOX) at 3.07%. This indicates that MSACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MSACXPRCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.00%

3.07%

+1.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.77%

9.39%

+9.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.69%

11.93%

+7.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.74%

17.34%

+1.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

18.35%

-0.07%

MSACX vs. PRCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MSACX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than PRCOX's 0.42% expense ratio.


Dividends

MSACX vs. PRCOX - Dividend Comparison

MSACX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MSACX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Active International Allocation Portfolio
0.00%0.00%3.49%3.41%1.73%8.51%0.04%1.25%1.70%2.04%2.42%0.97%
PRCOX
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research Fund
1.05%1.17%0.64%1.17%1.28%3.71%1.04%1.39%5.60%7.02%7.28%8.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


MSACX and PRCOX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MSACX has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to PRCOX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MSACX dropped -55.43% vs PRCOX's -53.96%.

PRCOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MSACX and PRCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer