MSA.TO vs. BCH
MSA.TO (Mineros S.A.) and BCH (Banco de Chile) are both stocks. MSA.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while BCH operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 3 years, MSA.TO returned 123.93%/yr vs 29.86%/yr for BCH. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSA.TO vs. BCH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSA.TO is traded in CAD, while BCH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCH values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSA.TO achieves a -4.61% return, which is significantly lower than BCH's 3.32% return.
MSA.TO
- 1D
- -3.11%
- 1M
- -7.83%
- YTD
- -4.61%
- 6M
- -2.18%
- 1Y
- 121.70%
- 3Y*
- 123.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCH
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 3.32%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 29.41%
- 3Y*
- 29.86%
- 5Y*
- 24.98%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
MSA.TO vs. BCH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSA.TO Mineros S.A. | -4.61% | 300.72% | 158.75% | 7.02% | -32.00% | -1.74% |
BCH Banco de Chile | 3.32% | 72.96% | 15.13% | 20.44% | 50.17% | -13.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSA.TO and BCH is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2021 | 0.14 |
The correlation between MSA.TO and BCH shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MSA.TO:
CA$1.58B
BCH:
$18.35B
MSA.TO:
CA$0.66
BCH:
$2.26K
MSA.TO:
8.08
BCH:
0.02
MSA.TO:
0.05
BCH:
0.00
MSA.TO:
1.69
BCH:
0.01
MSA.TO:
2.77
BCH:
0.00
MSA.TO:
CA$937.58M
BCH:
$3.07T
MSA.TO:
CA$403.36M
BCH:
$2.62T
MSA.TO:
CA$400.83M
BCH:
$1.55T
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSA.TO vs. BCH — Risk / Return Rank
MSA.TO
BCH
MSA.TO vs. BCH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mineros S.A. (MSA.TO) and Banco de Chile (BCH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSA.TO | BCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.18 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 1.48 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | 3.36 | +4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSA.TO | BCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 0.98 | +1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | 0.50 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
MSA.TO vs. BCH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSA.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.92%, smaller than the maximum BCH drawdown of -53.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSA.TO and BCH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSA.TO | BCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.92% | -53.25% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.74% | -19.97% | -20.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.74% | -19.97% | -20.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.43% | -15.19% | -14.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.06% | -10.74% | -8.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.01% | 8.78% | +7.23% |
Volatility
MSA.TO vs. BCH - Volatility Comparison
Mineros S.A. (MSA.TO) has a higher volatility of 18.99% compared to Banco de Chile (BCH) at 8.47%. This indicates that MSA.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSA.TO | BCH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.99% | 8.47% | +10.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.98% | 25.26% | +15.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.84% | 30.14% | +24.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.97% | 28.83% | +24.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.97% | 29.84% | +23.13% |
Dividends
MSA.TO vs. BCH - Dividend Comparison
MSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than BCH's 6.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCH Banco de Chile | 6.02% | 5.54% | 7.46% | 9.01% | 6.39% | 3.76% | 3.95% | 5.04% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 3.32% | 4.35% |
MSA.TO Mineros S.A. | 2.60% | 2.49% | 8.48% | 14.20% | 13.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MSA.TO vs. BCH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mineros S.A. and Banco de Chile. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MSA.TO vs. BCH - Profitability Comparison
MSA.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mineros S.A. reported a gross profit of 142.57M and revenue of 291.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.
BCH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Chile reported a gross profit of 661.74B and revenue of 1.05T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.8%.
MSA.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mineros S.A. reported an operating income of 135.21M and revenue of 291.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
BCH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Chile reported an operating income of 359.62B and revenue of 1.05T, resulting in an operating margin of 34.2%.
MSA.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mineros S.A. reported a net income of 87.69M and revenue of 291.81M, resulting in a net margin of 30.1%.
BCH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Banco de Chile reported a net income of 278.58B and revenue of 1.05T, resulting in a net margin of 26.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSA.TO and BCH have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MSA.TO and BCH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer