MSA.TO vs. AEP.L
MSA.TO (Mineros S.A.) and AEP.L (Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc) are both stocks. MSA.TO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while AEP.L operates in Farm Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, MSA.TO returned 128.00%/yr vs 35.47%/yr for AEP.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MSA.TO vs. AEP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MSA.TO is traded in CAD, while AEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the AEP.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MSA.TO achieves a 5.25% return, which is significantly lower than AEP.L's 20.95% return.
MSA.TO
- 1D
- -3.78%
- 1M
- 18.18%
- YTD
- 5.25%
- 6M
- 1.98%
- 1Y
- 138.79%
- 3Y*
- 128.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AEP.L
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- -6.75%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 6M
- 19.02%
- 1Y
- 121.69%
- 3Y*
- 35.47%
- 5Y*
- 25.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.11%
MSA.TO vs. AEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MSA.TO Mineros S.A. | 5.25% | 300.29% | 159.66% | 7.19% | -31.80% | -0.88% |
AEP.L Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc | 20.95% | 129.88% | 6.10% | -10.26% | 6.80% | 6.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between MSA.TO and AEP.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2021 | 0.05 |
The correlation between MSA.TO and AEP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MSA.TO:
CA$1.75B
AEP.L:
£636.02M
MSA.TO:
CA$0.66
AEP.L:
£4.05
MSA.TO:
8.92
AEP.L:
4.04
MSA.TO:
0.06
AEP.L:
0.39
MSA.TO:
1.86
AEP.L:
0.76
MSA.TO:
3.06
AEP.L:
1.09
MSA.TO:
CA$937.58M
AEP.L:
£838.60M
MSA.TO:
CA$403.36M
AEP.L:
£214.57M
MSA.TO:
CA$400.83M
AEP.L:
£230.87M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MSA.TO vs. AEP.L — Risk / Return Rank
MSA.TO
AEP.L
MSA.TO vs. AEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mineros S.A. (MSA.TO) and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MSA.TO | AEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.50 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.43 | 4.14 | -0.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 21.58 | -12.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MSA.TO | AEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.71 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.31 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
MSA.TO vs. AEP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MSA.TO drawdown since its inception was -49.75%, smaller than the maximum AEP.L drawdown of -61.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MSA.TO and AEP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MSA.TO | AEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.75% | -61.21% | +11.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.74% | -29.25% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.74% | -29.25% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -61.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.13% | -27.29% | +5.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.93% | -17.83% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.75% | 5.62% | +10.13% |
Volatility
MSA.TO vs. AEP.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Mineros S.A. (MSA.TO) is 19.02%, while Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc (AEP.L) has a volatility of 31.48%. This indicates that MSA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MSA.TO | AEP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.02% | 31.48% | -12.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.55% | 37.55% | +3.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.47% | 45.05% | +9.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.93% | 34.05% | +18.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.93% | 35.42% | +17.51% |
Dividends
MSA.TO vs. AEP.L - Dividend Comparison
MSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than AEP.L's 4.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AEP.L Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc | 4.01% | 4.80% | 1.81% | 4.78% | 0.51% | 0.10% | 0.07% | 0.40% | 0.53% | 0.39% | 0.26% | 0.56% |
MSA.TO Mineros S.A. | 2.34% | 2.49% | 8.46% | 14.31% | 13.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
MSA.TO vs. AEP.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mineros S.A. and Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MSA.TO vs. AEP.L - Profitability Comparison
MSA.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mineros S.A. reported a gross profit of 142.57M and revenue of 291.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.9%.
AEP.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported a gross profit of 63.11M and revenue of 235.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.
MSA.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mineros S.A. reported an operating income of 135.21M and revenue of 291.81M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
AEP.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported an operating income of 53.57M and revenue of 235.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 22.7%.
MSA.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mineros S.A. reported a net income of 87.69M and revenue of 291.81M, resulting in a net margin of 30.1%.
AEP.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Anglo-Eastern Plantations plc reported a net income of 42.42M and revenue of 235.87M, resulting in a net margin of 18.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MSA.TO and AEP.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for MSA.TO and AEP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer