PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRVL vs. BBIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MRVL vs. BBIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRVL achieves a 229.54% return, which is significantly higher than BBIO's -12.67% return.


MRVL

1D
-0.36%
1M
57.18%
YTD
229.54%
6M
231.70%
1Y
302.72%
3Y*
64.86%
5Y*
40.49%
10Y*
40.68%

BBIO

1D
-1.11%
1M
-2.64%
YTD
-12.67%
6M
-11.11%
1Y
68.47%
3Y*
58.58%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRVL vs. BBIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
229.54%-22.82%83.79%63.68%-57.48%84.62%80.25%12.84%
BBIO
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
-12.67%178.75%-32.03%429.79%-54.32%-76.54%102.88%14.51%

Correlation

The correlation between MRVL and BBIO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MRVL:

$249.86B

BBIO:

$13.01B

EPS

MRVL:

$2.90

BBIO:

-$3.76

PS Ratio

MRVL:

27.99

BBIO:

22.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

MRVL:

$8.72B

BBIO:

$566.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MRVL:

$4.41B

BBIO:

$538.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

MRVL:

$4.27B

BBIO:

-$602.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRVL vs. BBIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRVL
MRVL Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
MRVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRVL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
MRVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRVL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BBIO
BBIO Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
BBIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRVL vs. BBIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRVLBBIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.29

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

11.57

3.40

+8.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

26.42

8.27

+18.15

MRVL vs. BBIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRVL Sharpe Ratio is 4.30, which is higher than the BBIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRVL and BBIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRVL vs. BBIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRVL drawdown since its inception was -91.60%, roughly equal to the maximum BBIO drawdown of -92.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRVL and BBIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRVLBBIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.60%

-92.80%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.36%

-20.25%

-6.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-60.79%

-49.08%

-11.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.88%

-91.89%

+30.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.61%

-16.41%

+4.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.74%

-45.77%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

8.31%

+3.21%

Volatility

MRVL vs. BBIO - Volatility Comparison

Marvell Technology, Inc. (MRVL) has a higher volatility of 40.61% compared to BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) at 10.47%. This indicates that MRVL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRVLBBIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

40.61%

10.47%

+30.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.42%

34.18%

+21.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.94%

46.52%

+24.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.82%

85.91%

-24.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.94%

83.77%

-31.83%

Dividends

MRVL vs. BBIO - Dividend Comparison

MRVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while BBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBIO
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRVL
Marvell Technology, Inc.
0.09%0.28%0.22%0.40%0.65%0.21%0.50%0.90%1.48%1.12%1.73%2.72%

Financials

MRVL vs. BBIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Marvell Technology, Inc. and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
2.42B
180.60M
(MRVL) Total Revenue
(BBIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MRVL vs. BBIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Marvell Technology, Inc. and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
52.2%
98.8%
Portfolio components
MRVL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.26B and revenue of 2.42B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.

BBIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 178.39M and revenue of 180.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.8%.

MRVL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 339.40M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.0%.

BBIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported an operating income of -105.96M and revenue of 180.60M, resulting in an operating margin of -58.7%.

MRVL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Marvell Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 34.50M and revenue of 2.42B, resulting in a net margin of 1.4%.

BBIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported a net income of -164.04M and revenue of 180.60M, resulting in a net margin of -90.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MRVL and BBIO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRVL has higher volatility (40.61%) compared to BBIO (10.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRVL dropped -91.60% vs BBIO's -92.80%.

MRVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.30 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRVL and BBIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer