MRT vs. ZETA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Marti Technologies Inc (MRT) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA).

Performance

MRT vs. ZETA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marti Technologies Inc (MRT) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MRT vs. ZETA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MRT Marti Technologies Inc	-15.61%	-30.09%	421.54%	-89.17%
ZETA Zeta Global Holdings Corp.	-21.77%	13.12%	103.97%	3.64%

Fundamentals

EPS MRT : -$0.96 ZETA : -$0.21
PS Ratio MRT : 6.02 ZETA : 1.79
Total Revenue (TTM) MRT : $24.58M ZETA : $1.30B
Gross Profit (TTM) MRT : $5.55M ZETA : $791.08M
EBITDA (TTM) MRT : -$53.50M ZETA : $39.32M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRT achieves a -15.61% return, which is significantly higher than ZETA's -21.77% return.

MRT

• 1D: -0.50%
• 1M: -1.48%
• YTD: -15.61%
• 6M: -1.96%
• 1Y: -35.69%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZETA

• 1D: 7.49%
• 1M: -6.08%
• YTD: -21.77%
• 6M: -19.88%
• 1Y: 17.40%
• 3Y*: 13.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MRT vs. ZETA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRT

MRT Risk / Return Rank: 15
MRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
MRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
MRT Omega Ratio Rank: 17
MRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
MRT Martin Ratio Rank: 17

ZETA

ZETA Risk / Return Rank: 52
ZETA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
ZETA Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
ZETA Omega Ratio Rank: 52
ZETA Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
ZETA Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRT vs. ZETA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marti Technologies Inc (MRT) and Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MRT	ZETA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	0.24	-0.82
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.66	0.95	-1.61
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.11	-0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.87	0.39	-1.26
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.24	0.93	-2.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MRT vs. ZETA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRT Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is lower than the ZETA Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRT and ZETA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MRT	ZETA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.58	0.24	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.35	0.18	-0.53

Correlation

The correlation between MRT and ZETA is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

MRT vs. ZETA - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRT nor ZETA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MRT vs. ZETA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRT drawdown since its inception was -92.13%, which is greater than ZETA's maximum drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRT and ZETA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRT	ZETA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.13%	-70.01%	-22.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.20%	-40.37%	-1.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.67%	-56.67%	-10.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.08%	-33.41%	-33.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.63%	16.87%	+12.76%

Volatility

MRT vs. ZETA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marti Technologies Inc (MRT) is 9.43%, while Zeta Global Holdings Corp. (ZETA) has a volatility of 18.56%. This indicates that MRT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZETA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRT	ZETA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.43%	18.56%	-9.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.94%	49.43%	-13.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	62.11%	72.64%	-10.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	94.11%	72.31%	+21.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	94.11%	72.31%	+21.80%

Financials