MRNX vs. HUTG
MRNX (Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MRNA ETF) and HUTG (Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MRNX is actively managed, while HUTG is passively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MRNX charges 1.31%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HUTG.
Performance
MRNX vs. HUTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MRNX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -20.01%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
HUTG
- 1D
- 16.00%
- 1M
- -29.87%
- 6M
- 87.43%
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
MRNX vs. HUTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MRNX Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MRNA ETF | 41.92% |
HUTG Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF | 90.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRNX and HUTG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRNX vs. HUTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long MRNA ETF (MRNX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HUT Daily ETF (HUTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRNX vs. HUTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRNX drawdown since its inception was -49.28%, smaller than the maximum HUTG drawdown of -66.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRNX and HUTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRNX | HUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.28% | -66.30% | +17.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.12% | -42.04% | -7.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.18% | -28.81% | +6.63% |
Volatility
MRNX vs. HUTG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRNX | HUTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.23% | 212.70% | -74.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 138.23% | 212.70% | -74.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 138.23% | 212.70% | -74.47% |
MRNX vs. HUTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRNX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than HUTG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRNX vs. HUTG - Dividend Comparison
Neither MRNX nor HUTG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRNX and HUTG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HUTG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HUTG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for MRNX.
MRNX and HUTG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.31% for MRNX and 0.75% for HUTG.
Find the right allocation for MRNX and HUTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer