MRN3.L vs. 2NFL.L
MRN3.L (Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities) and 2NFL.L (Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares - MRN3.L tracks the iSTOXX Leveraged 3x MRNA Index while 2NFL.L tracks the NYSE Leveraged 2x NFLX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, MRN3.L returned -89.46%/yr vs 18.90%/yr for 2NFL.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
MRN3.L vs. 2NFL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
MRN3.L is traded in USD, while 2NFL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2NFL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRN3.L achieves a 264.08% return, which is significantly higher than 2NFL.L's -46.41% return.
MRN3.L
- 1D
- -10.78%
- 1M
- 71.72%
- YTD
- 264.08%
- 6M
- 201.33%
- 1Y
- 186.72%
- 3Y*
- -89.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2NFL.L
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -33.07%
- YTD
- -46.41%
- 6M
- -46.31%
- 1Y
- -74.53%
- 3Y*
- 18.90%
- 5Y*
- -14.58%
- 10Y*
- —
MRN3.L vs. 2NFL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MRN3.L Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities | 264.08% | 3,452.08% | -98.51% | -99.99% | -92.34% | -16.57% |
2NFL.L Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP | -46.41% | -13.99% | 188.09% | 126.59% | -88.48% | -0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRN3.L and 2NFL.L is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2021 | 0.11 |
The correlation between MRN3.L and 2NFL.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MRN3.L vs. 2NFL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MRN3.L
2NFL.L
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
MRN3.L
2NFL.L
-
Basic Materials
MRN3.L
-
2NFL.L
-
Communication Services
MRN3.L
-
2NFL.L
Consumer Cyclical
MRN3.L
-
2NFL.L
-
Consumer Defensive
MRN3.L
-
2NFL.L
-
Energy
MRN3.L
-
2NFL.L
-
Financial Services
MRN3.L
-
2NFL.L
-
Industrials
MRN3.L
-
2NFL.L
-
Real Estate
MRN3.L
-
2NFL.L
-
Technology
MRN3.L
-
2NFL.L
-
Utilities
MRN3.L
-
2NFL.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRN3.L vs. 2NFL.L — Risk / Return Rank
MRN3.L
2NFL.L
MRN3.L vs. 2NFL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities (MRN3.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRN3.L | 2NFL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 0.71 | +0.58 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | -0.98 | +3.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.55 | -1.54 | +5.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRN3.L vs. 2NFL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRN3.L drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum 2NFL.L drawdown of -96.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRN3.L and 2NFL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRN3.L | 2NFL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -96.36% | -3.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -81.26% | -75.93% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -100.00% | -75.93% | -24.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -96.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -75.93% | -24.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.96% | -52.56% | -44.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.33% | 48.40% | +3.93% |
Volatility
MRN3.L vs. 2NFL.L - Volatility Comparison
Leverage Shares 3x Long Moderna (MRNA) ETP Securities (MRN3.L) has a higher volatility of 66.43% compared to Leverage Shares 2x Netflix ETC A GBP (2NFL.L) at 15.43%. This indicates that MRN3.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 2NFL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRN3.L | 2NFL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 66.43% | 15.43% | +51.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 167.63% | 51.66% | +115.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 215.21% | 64.15% | +151.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23,261.64% | 93.30% | +23,168.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23,261.64% | 88.44% | +23,173.20% |
MRN3.L vs. 2NFL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both MRN3.L and 2NFL.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
MRN3.L vs. 2NFL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither MRN3.L nor 2NFL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRN3.L and 2NFL.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MRN3.L and 2NFL.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
MRN3.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x MRNA Index, while 2NFL.L tracks NYSE Leveraged 2x NFLX Index.
Find the right allocation for MRN3.L and 2NFL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer