MRLIX vs. YACKX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MRLIX (AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund) and YACKX (AMG Yacktman Fund) are both mutual funds - MRLIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by AMG, while YACKX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund managed by AMG. Over the past 10 years, MRLIX returned 13.34%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for YACKX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MRLIX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for YACKX.

Performance

MRLIX vs. YACKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRLIX achieves a 3.29% return, which is significantly lower than YACKX's 14.69% return. Over the past 10 years, MRLIX has outperformed YACKX with an annualized return of 13.34%, while YACKX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.37% annualized return.

MRLIX

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 2.15%
• YTD: 3.29%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: -3.40%
• 3Y*: 6.78%
• 5Y*: 5.56%
• 10Y*: 13.34%

YACKX

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -1.07%
• YTD: 14.69%
• 6M: 16.07%
• 1Y: 9.89%
• 3Y*: 13.66%
• 5Y*: 8.13%
• 10Y*: 12.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRLIX vs. YACKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MRLIX AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund	3.29%	-4.22%	9.25%	25.51%	-16.98%	30.76%	23.92%	47.97%	-6.66%	22.50%
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund	14.69%	1.34%	13.15%	15.46%	-7.50%	19.66%	15.25%	27.49%	2.79%	18.25%

Correlation

The correlation between MRLIX and YACKX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2009	0.78

Over the past year, the correlation between MRLIX and YACKX has dropped to 0.51 - well below their long-term average of 0.78, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

MRLIX vs. YACKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRLIX

MRLIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
MRLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
MRLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
MRLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
MRLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MRLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

YACKX

YACKX Risk / Return Rank: 8
YACKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
YACKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
YACKX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
YACKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
YACKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRLIX vs. YACKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) and AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MRLIX	YACKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.11	0.50	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	0.64	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.16	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.10	0.60	-0.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.20	1.73	-1.93

MRLIX vs. YACKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRLIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the YACKX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRLIX and YACKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MRLIX vs. YACKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRLIX drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, smaller than the maximum YACKX drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRLIX and YACKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRLIX	YACKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.16%	-46.65%	+12.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.75%	-16.30%	-7.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.51%	-18.30%	-9.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.51%	-19.86%	-7.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.16%	-30.93%	-3.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.28%	-4.83%	-10.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.41%	-5.27%	-0.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.79%	5.62%	+6.17%

Volatility

MRLIX vs. YACKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) is 4.49%, while AMG Yacktman Fund (YACKX) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that MRLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YACKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRLIX	YACKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	4.96%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.47%	19.88%	-0.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.66%	19.73%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.97%	17.16%	+1.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.76%	16.19%	+3.57%

MRLIX vs. YACKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRLIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than YACKX's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

MRLIX vs. YACKX - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRLIX nor YACKX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MRLIX AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	1.52%	7.77%	7.44%	8.36%	5.23%	17.34%	24.83%	3.35%	2.29%	1.59%
YACKX AMG Yacktman Fund	0.00%	0.00%	17.32%	4.39%	7.35%	3.72%	10.82%	16.84%	23.06%	10.67%	8.57%	13.66%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRLIX and YACKX in my portfolio?

MRLIX and YACKX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MRLIX or YACKX?

YACKX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to MRLIX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRLIX dropped -34.16% vs YACKX's -46.65%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

YACKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.