PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRLIX vs. SSSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRLIX vs. SSSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) and SouthernSun Small Cap (SSSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRLIX achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than SSSFX's 10.79% return. Over the past 10 years, MRLIX has outperformed SSSFX with an annualized return of 12.82%, while SSSFX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.23% annualized return.


MRLIX

1D
0.40%
1M
1.22%
YTD
2.64%
6M
-10.77%
1Y
-3.16%
3Y*
7.10%
5Y*
5.93%
10Y*
12.82%

SSSFX

1D
1.28%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
10.79%
6M
8.04%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
6.35%
10Y*
9.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRLIX vs. SSSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRLIX
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund
2.64%-4.22%9.25%25.51%-16.98%30.76%23.92%47.97%-6.66%22.50%
SSSFX
SouthernSun Small Cap
10.79%4.72%3.46%12.52%-1.86%21.87%14.08%35.45%-24.32%18.03%

Correlation

The correlation between MRLIX and SSSFX is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2009

0.76

The correlation between MRLIX and SSSFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRLIX vs. SSSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRLIX
MRLIX Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
MRLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
MRLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

SSSFX
SSSFX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SSSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SSSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRLIX vs. SSSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) and SouthernSun Small Cap (SSSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRLIXSSSFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.14

1.24

-1.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.04

1.88

-1.92

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.21

-0.22

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.15

1.73

-1.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.31

4.63

-4.94

MRLIX vs. SSSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRLIX Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is lower than the SSSFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRLIX and SSSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRLIXSSSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

1.24

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.28

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.40

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.39

+0.31

Drawdowns

MRLIX vs. SSSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRLIX drawdown since its inception was -34.16%, smaller than the maximum SSSFX drawdown of -65.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRLIX and SSSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRLIXSSSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.16%

-65.85%

+31.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.75%

-14.39%

-9.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.51%

-32.76%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.51%

-32.76%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.16%

-45.20%

+11.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.81%

-6.42%

-9.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.37%

-10.90%

+5.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.28%

5.34%

+5.94%

Volatility

MRLIX vs. SSSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund (MRLIX) is 3.00%, while SouthernSun Small Cap (SSSFX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that MRLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRLIXSSSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

6.40%

-3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

14.39%

+4.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.38%

20.12%

+0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.90%

22.52%

-3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.72%

23.32%

-3.60%

MRLIX vs. SSSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRLIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than SSSFX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRLIX vs. SSSFX - Dividend Comparison

MRLIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SSSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRLIX
AMG Renaissance Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%1.52%7.77%7.44%8.36%5.23%17.34%24.83%3.35%2.29%1.59%
SSSFX
SouthernSun Small Cap
4.55%5.04%13.93%13.87%9.40%11.51%0.23%5.29%4.77%0.00%0.00%12.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRLIX and SSSFX have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSSFX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to MRLIX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRLIX dropped -34.16% vs SSSFX's -65.85%.

SSSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRLIX and SSSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer