PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRK vs. PDBC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRK vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRK achieves a 9.78% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 36.23% return. Over the past 10 years, MRK has outperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 11.18%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively lower 8.79% annualized return.


MRK

1D
-0.82%
1M
1.41%
YTD
9.78%
6M
13.95%
1Y
54.09%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
11.18%

PDBC

1D
0.39%
1M
-3.37%
YTD
36.23%
6M
36.27%
1Y
45.46%
3Y*
14.42%
5Y*
12.39%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRK vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
9.78%9.79%-6.26%1.01%49.42%1.75%-7.20%22.27%39.95%-1.49%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
36.23%5.96%2.09%-6.25%19.23%41.72%-7.84%11.44%-12.78%5.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MRK and PDBC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

0.07

The correlation between MRK and PDBC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRK vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRK
MRK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
MRK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRK Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MRK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRK Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

PDBC
PDBC Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PDBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDBC Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PDBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDBC Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRK vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRKPDBCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.78

6.35

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.00

13.39

-1.39

MRK vs. PDBC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRK Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the PDBC Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRK and PDBC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRKPDBCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

2.46

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.65

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.50

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.23

+0.25

Drawdowns

MRK vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRK drawdown since its inception was -68.61%, which is greater than PDBC's maximum drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRK and PDBC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRKPDBCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.61%

-49.52%

-19.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-7.19%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.44%

-13.95%

-29.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.44%

-27.63%

-15.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.44%

-40.73%

-2.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.50%

-4.55%

-3.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-23.21%

+4.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.52%

3.41%

+1.11%

Volatility

MRK vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison

Merck & Co., Inc. (MRK) has a higher volatility of 8.21% compared to Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) at 6.20%. This indicates that MRK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRKPDBCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.21%

6.20%

+2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.62%

15.78%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.92%

18.61%

+8.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.62%

19.12%

+4.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.91%

17.78%

+5.13%

Dividends

MRK vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison

MRK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than PDBC's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MRK
Merck & Co., Inc.
2.89%3.12%3.14%2.72%2.52%3.41%3.03%2.48%2.60%3.36%3.14%3.43%
PDBC
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF
2.82%3.84%4.42%4.21%13.05%50.83%0.01%1.40%1.00%3.83%6.51%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRK and PDBC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRK has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to PDBC (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRK dropped -68.61% vs PDBC's -49.52%.

PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRK and PDBC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer