PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRGAX vs. FTZIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRGAX vs. FTZIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRGAX achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly lower than FTZIX's 21.73% return.


MRGAX

1D
0.08%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
4.92%
6M
3.72%
1Y
14.42%
3Y*
16.24%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
14.23%

FTZIX

1D
1.56%
1M
6.74%
YTD
21.73%
6M
19.33%
1Y
43.95%
3Y*
28.15%
5Y*
14.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRGAX vs. FTZIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
MRGAX
MFS Core Equity Fund
4.92%12.33%20.01%22.88%-17.24%25.26%18.56%34.66%0.86%
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
21.73%22.63%25.31%27.18%-21.31%25.25%19.60%33.70%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between MRGAX and FTZIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2018

0.88

The correlation between MRGAX and FTZIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.77 (1 year) to 0.88 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRGAX vs. FTZIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRGAX
MRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
MRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
MRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

FTZIX
FTZIX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FTZIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTZIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTZIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FTZIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTZIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRGAX vs. FTZIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MRGAXFTZIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.43

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.50

4.85

-3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.12

18.71

-12.59

MRGAX vs. FTZIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is lower than the FTZIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRGAX and FTZIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MRGAX vs. FTZIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRGAX drawdown since its inception was -54.04%, which is greater than FTZIX's maximum drawdown of -37.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRGAX and FTZIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRGAXFTZIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.04%

-37.22%

-16.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.53%

-9.03%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

-18.65%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.08%

-29.53%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.16%

-0.01%

-3.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-6.46%

-1.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.33%

-0.01%

Volatility

MRGAX vs. FTZIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Core Equity Fund (MRGAX) is 4.61%, while Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund (FTZIX) has a volatility of 5.52%. This indicates that MRGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTZIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRGAXFTZIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.61%

5.52%

-0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.87%

13.51%

-3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

16.81%

-4.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.87%

19.54%

-2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.79%

22.33%

-4.54%

MRGAX vs. FTZIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRGAX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than FTZIX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRGAX vs. FTZIX - Dividend Comparison

MRGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.96%, more than FTZIX's 0.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTZIX
Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Unconstrained Equity Fund
0.04%0.05%0.11%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.26%0.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MRGAX
MFS Core Equity Fund
12.96%13.60%8.21%2.54%3.83%7.28%1.54%3.20%11.09%6.27%3.65%11.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


MRGAX and FTZIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTZIX has higher volatility (5.52%) compared to MRGAX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRGAX dropped -54.04% vs FTZIX's -37.22%.

FTZIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRGAX and FTZIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer