PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRCP vs. OCTQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MRCP vs. OCTQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MRCP vs. OCTQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period


MRCP

1D
1.86%
1M
-2.94%
YTD
-1.03%
6M
1.61%
1Y
13.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OCTQ

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MRCP vs. OCTQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRCP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than OCTQ's 0.79% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MRCP vs. OCTQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRCP
MRCP Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
MRCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRCP Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
MRCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRCP Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

OCTQ
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRCP vs. OCTQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - October (OCTQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRCPOCTQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.79

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.54

MRCP vs. OCTQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRCPOCTQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

Dividends

MRCP vs. OCTQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRCP nor OCTQ has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MRCP vs. OCTQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRCP drawdown since its inception was -10.73%, which is greater than OCTQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRCP and OCTQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MRCPOCTQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

0.00%

-10.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.04%

0.00%

-3.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.81%

0.00%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.45%

Volatility

MRCP vs. OCTQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MRCPOCTQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.29%

0.00%

+11.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.48%

0.00%

+9.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.48%

0.00%

+9.48%