MRCP vs. APRP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MRCP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March) and APRP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds from PGIM. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MRCP returned 18.03% vs 17.90% for APRP. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

MRCP vs. APRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRCP achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly lower than APRP's 9.34% return.

MRCP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 7.27%
• 6M: 8.29%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRP

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 9.34%
• 6M: 10.32%
• 1Y: 17.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRCP vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March	7.27%	14.13%	10.06%
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	9.34%	7.80%	10.28%

Correlation

The correlation between MRCP and APRP is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	0.96

The correlation between MRCP and APRP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MRCP vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRCP

MRCP Risk / Return Rank: 87
MRCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MRCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MRCP Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MRCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MRCP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

APRP

APRP Risk / Return Rank: 98
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRCP vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MRCP	APRP	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	4.15	-1.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.29	7.11	-2.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	2.04	-0.43
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	16.51	-12.75
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.57	73.52	-51.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MRCP vs. APRP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRCP Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is comparable to the APRP Sharpe Ratio of 4.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRCP and APRP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MRCP	APRP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	4.15	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.60	1.36	+0.24

Drawdowns

MRCP vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRCP drawdown since its inception was -10.73%, smaller than the maximum APRP drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRCP and APRP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRCP	APRP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.73%	-13.66%	+2.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.81%	-1.09%	-3.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.19%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-1.23%	+0.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	0.24%	+0.60%

Volatility

MRCP vs. APRP - Volatility Comparison

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP) at 1.16%. This indicates that MRCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRCP	APRP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.36%	1.16%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.95%	3.37%	+1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.24%	4.33%	+1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.27%	9.49%	-0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.27%	9.49%	-0.22%

MRCP vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MRCP and APRP have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

MRCP vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRCP nor APRP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRCP and APRP in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, MRCP and APRP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MRCP or APRP?

MRCP has higher volatility (1.36%) compared to APRP (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRCP dropped -10.73% vs APRP's -13.66%.

Which ETF is better, MRCP or APRP?

On 1-year performance, MRCP leads with 18.03% vs 17.90% for APRP. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. On volatility, APRP has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MRCP or APRP?

Over the 1-year period, MRCP has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 17.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MRCP or APRP?

MRCP and APRP have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MRCP or APRP?

MRCP and APRP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

APRP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.15 vs 2.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.