MRCP vs. AMZP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MRCP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March) and AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MRCP returned 18.03% vs 20.81% for AMZP. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MRCP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMZP.

Performance

MRCP vs. AMZP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRCP achieves a 7.27% return, which is significantly higher than AMZP's 5.27% return.

MRCP

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 2.27%
• YTD: 7.27%
• 6M: 8.29%
• 1Y: 18.03%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMZP

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -8.93%
• YTD: 5.27%
• 6M: 5.85%
• 1Y: 20.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRCP vs. AMZP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March	7.27%	14.13%	11.42%
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	5.27%	9.56%	20.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MRCP and AMZP is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2024	0.60

The correlation between MRCP and AMZP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MRCP vs. AMZP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRCP

MRCP Risk / Return Rank: 87
MRCP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MRCP Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
MRCP Omega Ratio Rank: 92
MRCP Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MRCP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AMZP

AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 21
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 22
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 20

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRCP vs. AMZP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MRCP	AMZP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.91	0.72	+2.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.29	1.15	+3.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.14	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.76	0.88	+2.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	21.57	2.27	+19.30
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MRCP vs. AMZP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRCP Sharpe Ratio is 2.91, which is higher than the AMZP Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRCP and AMZP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MRCP	AMZP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.91	0.72	+2.19
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.60	0.87	+0.73

Drawdowns

MRCP vs. AMZP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRCP drawdown since its inception was -10.73%, smaller than the maximum AMZP drawdown of -27.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRCP and AMZP.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRCP	AMZP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.73%	-27.36%	+16.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.81%	-23.64%	+18.83%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-10.17%	+9.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.77%	-6.02%	+5.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.84%	9.17%	-8.33%

Volatility

MRCP vs. AMZP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March (MRCP) is 1.36%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a volatility of 8.28%. This indicates that MRCP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRCP	AMZP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.36%	8.28%	-6.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.95%	22.18%	-17.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.24%	29.12%	-22.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.27%	26.85%	-17.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.27%	26.85%	-17.58%

MRCP vs. AMZP - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRCP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZP's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MRCP vs. AMZP - Dividend Comparison

MRCP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.53%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	19.53%	22.04%	15.15%	2.45%
MRCP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - March	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRCP and AMZP in my portfolio?

MRCP and AMZP have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MRCP or AMZP?

AMZP has higher volatility (8.28%) compared to MRCP (1.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRCP dropped -10.73% vs AMZP's -27.36%.

Which ETF is better, MRCP or AMZP?

On 1-year performance, AMZP leads with 20.81% vs 18.03% for MRCP. On fees, MRCP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, MRCP has been the lower-risk option at 1.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MRCP or AMZP?

Over the 1-year period, AMZP has performed better with a 20.81% return vs 18.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MRCP or AMZP?

MRCP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MRCP or AMZP?

AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 19.53%, compared with 0.00% for MRCP.

What is the main difference between MRCP and AMZP?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Kurv. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MRCP and 0.99% for AMZP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MRCP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.91 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.