MRAL vs. XTJL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MRAL (GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF) and XTJL (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MRAL is passively managed, while XTJL is actively managed. Over the past year, MRAL returned -76.80% vs 14.27% for XTJL. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MRAL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XTJL.

Performance

MRAL vs. XTJL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRAL achieves a -8.52% return, which is significantly lower than XTJL's 6.32% return.

MRAL

• 1D: -8.96%
• 1M: -24.24%
• 6M: -13.43%
• YTD: -8.52%
• 1Y: -76.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -72.71%

XTJL

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 0.96%
• 6M: 5.49%
• YTD: 6.32%
• 1Y: 14.27%
• 3Y*: 13.98%
• 5Y*: 9.55%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MRAL GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF	$4.23M	$5.15M	$7.61M
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July	$26.11K	$26.81K	$267.40K

MRAL vs. XTJL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MRAL GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF	-8.52%	-82.23%
XTJL Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July	6.32%	16.23%

Correlation

The correlation between MRAL and XTJL is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2025	0.47

MRAL vs. XTJL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MRAL	XTJL
Financial Services	66.7%	10.9%
Basic Materials	-	1.7%
Communication Services	-	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.5%
Energy	-	3.1%
Healthcare	-	8.3%
Industrials	-	7.8%
Real Estate	-	1.8%
Technology	-	39.1%
Utilities	-	2.1%

Return for Risk

MRAL vs. XTJL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MRAL

MRAL Risk / Return Rank: 5
MRAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MRAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MRAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MRAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MRAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

XTJL

XTJL Risk / Return Rank: 79
XTJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
XTJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
XTJL Omega Ratio Rank: 84
XTJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
XTJL Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MRAL vs. XTJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MRAL	XTJL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	1.68	-2.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.21	2.48	-2.70
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.36	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	2.55	-3.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	14.07	-15.16

MRAL vs. XTJL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the XTJL Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRAL and XTJL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MRAL vs. XTJL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRAL drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, which is greater than XTJL's maximum drawdown of -23.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAL and XTJL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRAL	XTJL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.46%	-23.24%	-70.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-93.46%	-5.12%	-88.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.95%	-0.09%	-87.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.89%	-3.92%	-54.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	71.78%	0.93%	+70.85%

Volatility

MRAL vs. XTJL - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) has a higher volatility of 60.92% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated Plus ETF - July (XTJL) at 2.90%. This indicates that MRAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XTJL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MRAL	XTJL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	60.92%	2.90%	+58.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	127.55%	6.12%	+121.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	162.66%	7.79%	+154.87%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	167.33%	15.11%	+152.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	167.33%	15.03%	+152.30%

MRAL vs. XTJL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRAL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XTJL's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

MRAL vs. XTJL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRAL nor XTJL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRAL and XTJL in my portfolio?

MRAL and XTJL have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MRAL or XTJL?

MRAL has higher volatility (60.92%) compared to XTJL (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAL dropped -93.46% vs XTJL's -23.24%.

Which ETF is better, MRAL or XTJL?

On 1-year performance, XTJL leads with 14.27% vs -76.80% for MRAL. On fees, XTJL is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XTJL has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MRAL or XTJL?

Over the 1-year period, XTJL has performed better with a 14.27% return vs -76.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MRAL or XTJL?

XTJL is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MRAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MRAL or XTJL?

MRAL and XTJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MRAL and XTJL?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MRAL and 0.79% for XTJL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTJL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.