PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MRAL vs. IFED
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MRAL vs. IFED - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MRAL achieves a 65.74% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -3.52% return.


MRAL

1D
-4.00%
1M
33.63%
YTD
65.74%
6M
-16.49%
1Y
-60.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IFED

1D
-1.24%
1M
4.85%
YTD
-3.52%
6M
-3.51%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MRAL vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MRAL and IFED is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MRAL vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRAL
MRAL Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
MRAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRAL Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MRAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRAL Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

IFED
IFED Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IFED Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IFED Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IFED Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IFED Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
IFED Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRAL vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MRALIFEDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.04

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

0.14

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.92

0.34

-1.27

MRAL vs. IFED - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MRAL Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the IFED Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MRAL and IFED, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MRALIFEDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

0.12

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.40

0.65

-1.05

Drawdowns

MRAL vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRAL drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAL and IFED.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MRALIFEDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.46%

-22.36%

-71.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-93.46%

-14.65%

-78.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.17%

-5.50%

-72.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-56.03%

-5.84%

-50.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.02%

5.75%

+60.27%

Volatility

MRAL vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) has a higher volatility of 33.29% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.50%. This indicates that MRAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MRALIFEDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

33.29%

4.50%

+28.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

115.01%

12.86%

+102.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

153.49%

16.21%

+137.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

164.22%

19.88%

+144.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

164.22%

19.88%

+144.34%

MRAL vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRAL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

MRAL vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRAL nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MRAL and IFED have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRAL has higher volatility (33.29%) compared to IFED (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAL dropped -93.46% vs IFED's -22.36%.

On 1-year performance, IFED leads with 1.97% vs -60.79% for MRAL. On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, IFED has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IFED has performed better with a 1.97% return vs -60.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MRAL.

MRAL and IFED have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MRAL tracks MARA Holdings Inc. (MARA), while IFED tracks IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MRAL and 0.45% for IFED.

IFED currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MRAL and IFED

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer