MRAL vs. CRMG
MRAL (GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF) and CRMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MRAL is passively managed, while CRMG is actively managed. Over the past year, MRAL returned -51.00% vs -73.99% for CRMG. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MRAL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CRMG.
Performance
MRAL vs. CRMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MRAL achieves a 74.43% return, which is significantly higher than CRMG's -71.26% return.
MRAL
- 1D
- -2.03%
- 1M
- 7.48%
- YTD
- 74.43%
- 6M
- 44.25%
- 1Y
- -51.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRMG
- 1D
- 4.23%
- 1M
- -29.64%
- YTD
- -71.26%
- 6M
- -71.01%
- 1Y
- -73.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MRAL vs. CRMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MRAL GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF | 74.43% | -62.25% |
CRMG Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF | -71.26% | -0.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between MRAL and CRMG is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 4, 2025 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MRAL vs. CRMG — Risk / Return Rank
MRAL
CRMG
MRAL vs. CRMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MRAL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.79 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.55 | -0.97 | +0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.75 | -1.70 | +0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MRAL vs. CRMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MRAL drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, which is greater than CRMG's maximum drawdown of -79.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAL and CRMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MRAL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.46% | -79.83% | -13.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -93.46% | -76.80% | -16.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.03% | -78.97% | +1.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -56.79% | -39.18% | -17.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.29% | 43.41% | +24.88% |
Volatility
MRAL vs. CRMG - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) has a higher volatility of 44.96% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long CRM Daily ETF (CRMG) at 32.53%. This indicates that MRAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MRAL | CRMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 44.96% | 32.53% | +12.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 118.77% | 63.74% | +55.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 156.74% | 76.12% | +80.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 164.85% | 75.39% | +89.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 164.85% | 75.39% | +89.46% |
MRAL vs. CRMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MRAL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CRMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MRAL vs. CRMG - Dividend Comparison
Neither MRAL nor CRMG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MRAL and CRMG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MRAL has higher volatility (44.96%) compared to CRMG (32.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MRAL dropped -93.46% vs CRMG's -79.83%.
On 1-year performance, MRAL leads with -51.00% vs -73.99% for CRMG. On fees, CRMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, CRMG has been the lower-risk option at 32.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MRAL has performed better with a -51.00% return vs -73.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CRMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MRAL.
MRAL and CRMG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MRAL and 0.75% for CRMG.
MRAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MRAL and CRMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer