MRAL vs. BRKL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MRAL (GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. MRAL is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.22 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MRAL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.

Performance

MRAL vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MRAL

• 1D: -8.96%
• 1M: -24.24%
• 6M: -13.43%
• YTD: -8.52%
• 1Y: -76.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -72.71%

BRKL

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF	$853.16	$14.75K	$14.75K
MRAL GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF	$4.23M	$5.15M	$7.61M

MRAL vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MRAL GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF	-30.81%
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF	1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between MRAL and BRKL is -0.22, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026	-0.22

Return for Risk

MRAL vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MRAL

MRAL Risk / Return Rank: 5
MRAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
MRAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
MRAL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
MRAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
MRAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

BRKL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MRAL vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long MARA Daily ETF (MRAL) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MRAL	BRKL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.84	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	—	—

Drawdowns

MRAL vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRAL drawdown since its inception was -93.46%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRAL and BRKL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRAL	BRKL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.46%	-7.03%	-86.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-93.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-87.95%	-0.13%	-87.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-58.89%	-4.14%	-54.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	71.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MRAL	BRKL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	60.92%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	127.55%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	162.66%	30.99%	+131.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	167.33%	30.99%	+136.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	167.33%	30.99%	+136.34%

MRAL vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRAL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

MRAL vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MRAL nor BRKL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRAL and BRKL in my portfolio?

MRAL and BRKL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MRAL or BRKL?

On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MRAL or BRKL?

BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for MRAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MRAL or BRKL?

MRAL and BRKL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MRAL and BRKL?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for MRAL and 0.45% for BRKL.