MRA vs. GOOY

Last updated Jul 24, 2026

MRA (GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF) and GOOY (YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MRA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOY.

Performance

MRA vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF (MRA) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MRA

• 1D: 1.54%
• 1M: -3.34%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

GOOY

• 1D: -5.98%
• 1M: -6.62%
• 6M: -2.59%
• YTD: 2.32%
• 1Y: 53.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.77%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	$5.11M	$4.90M	$8.16M
MRA GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF	$2.07K	$2.83K	$3.71K

MRA vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
MRA GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF	-2.10%
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	-15.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MRA and GOOY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	0.13

Return for Risk

MRA vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MRA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

GOOY

GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 81
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 83
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MRA vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF (MRA) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MRA	GOOY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.13	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.97	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.38	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.04	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.80	—

Drawdowns

MRA vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MRA drawdown since its inception was -14.11%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MRA and GOOY.

Drawdown Indicators

	MRA	GOOY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.11%	-24.40%	+10.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-17.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.06%	-17.70%	+13.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.13%	-6.40%	+2.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.47%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MRA	GOOY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.72%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.71%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.26%	25.21%	+16.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.26%	23.76%	+17.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.26%	23.76%	+17.50%

MRA vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

MRA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

MRA vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

MRA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%, less than GOOY's 58.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GOOY YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF	58.74%	41.50%	36.74%	7.90%
MRA GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF	7.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MRA and GOOY in my portfolio?

MRA and GOOY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MRA or GOOY?

On fees, GOOY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MRA or GOOY?

GOOY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for MRA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MRA or GOOY?

GOOY has the higher dividend yield at 58.74%, compared with 7.51% for MRA.

What is the main difference between MRA and GOOY?

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for MRA and 0.99% for GOOY.