PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQQQ vs. WTIU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MQQQ vs. WTIU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MQQQ vs. WTIU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
-11.27%31.67%19.72%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
113.23%-17.13%-26.79%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a -11.27% return, which is significantly lower than WTIU's 113.23% return.


MQQQ

1D
2.43%
1M
-8.42%
YTD
-11.27%
6M
-9.68%
1Y
40.47%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

WTIU

1D
-11.84%
1M
17.12%
YTD
113.23%
6M
89.84%
1Y
46.84%
3Y*
2.42%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MQQQ vs. WTIU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than WTIU's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. WTIU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

WTIU
WTIU Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
WTIU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTIU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTIU Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
WTIU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTIU Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQQQ vs. WTIU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MQQQWTIUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.87

0.58

+0.29

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.51

1.22

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

0.92

+0.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.73

1.71

+4.02

MQQQ vs. WTIU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the WTIU Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and WTIU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MQQQWTIUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

0.58

+0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

-0.05

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and WTIU is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MQQQ vs. WTIU - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, while WTIU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
2.27%2.02%0.02%
WTIU
MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. WTIU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum WTIU drawdown of -75.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and WTIU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MQQQWTIUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-75.73%

+33.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-53.11%

+27.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.75%

-24.42%

+6.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-39.49%

+31.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.46%

28.53%

-21.07%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. WTIU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 13.84%, while MicroSectors Energy 3X Leveraged ETN (WTIU) has a volatility of 22.50%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTIU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MQQQWTIUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.84%

22.50%

-8.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.46%

46.56%

-20.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.81%

81.69%

-34.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.28%

69.54%

-25.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.28%

69.54%

-25.26%