PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQQQ vs. TSLQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly higher than TSLQ's -3.80% return.


MQQQ

1D
1.03%
1M
20.59%
YTD
39.32%
6M
35.46%
1Y
83.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLQ

1D
-3.75%
1M
-18.02%
YTD
-3.80%
6M
-15.12%
1Y
-62.78%
3Y*
-68.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
39.32%31.67%19.72%
TSLQ
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF
-3.80%-74.67%-84.45%

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and TSLQ is -0.56, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

-0.61

The correlation between MQQQ and TSLQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.61 to -0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLQ
TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MQQQTSLQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

-0.68

+3.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

-0.86

+3.93

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.91

+0.49

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

-0.82

+4.21

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.24

-1.04

+13.28

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the TSLQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and TSLQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MQQQTSLQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

-0.68

+3.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

-0.65

+1.97

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and TSLQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQQQTSLQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-98.73%

+56.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-75.93%

+50.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-97.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-98.57%

+98.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-67.15%

+59.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

59.46%

-52.46%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 8.50%, while AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a volatility of 24.08%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQQQTSLQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

24.08%

-15.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.50%

54.84%

-30.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.19%

92.72%

-60.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.26%

94.16%

-50.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.26%

94.16%

-50.90%

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLQ's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than TSLQ's 10.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
1.45%2.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%
TSLQ
AXS TSLA Bear Daily ETF
10.98%10.56%4.95%13.35%2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQQQ and TSLQ have a correlation of -0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLQ has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to MQQQ (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 83.05% vs -62.78% for TSLQ. On fees, TSLQ is cheaper at 1.15% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 83.05% return vs -62.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLQ is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.98%, compared with 1.45% for MQQQ.

MQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLQ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 1.15% for TSLQ.

MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQQQ and TSLQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer