MQQQ vs. TSLQ

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

MQQQ (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF) and TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. MQQQ is passively managed, while TSLQ is actively managed. Over the past year, MQQQ returned 49.32% vs -62.74% for TSLQ. At a correlation of -0.63, they often move in opposite directions. MQQQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for TSLQ.

Performance

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 25.95% return, which is significantly higher than TSLQ's -0.50% return.

MQQQ

• 1D: -3.75%
• 1M: -3.01%
• 6M: 21.12%
• YTD: 25.95%
• 1Y: 49.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSLQ

• 1D: 6.42%
• 1M: -1.63%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: -0.50%
• 1Y: -62.74%
• 3Y*: -64.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF	25.95%	31.67%	16.76%
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF	-0.50%	-74.67%	-83.93%

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and TSLQ is -0.63, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2024	-0.63

The correlation between MQQQ and TSLQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.63 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQQQ

MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 47
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 50

TSLQ

TSLQ Risk / Return Rank: 3
TSLQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
TSLQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
TSLQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
TSLQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
TSLQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MQQQ	TSLQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.34	-0.70	+2.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.83	-0.90	+2.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	0.90	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.96	-0.91	+2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.65	-1.15	+7.81

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the TSLQ Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and TSLQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and TSLQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	MQQQ	TSLQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.16%	-98.73%	+56.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.23%	-69.32%	+44.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-97.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.60%	-98.52%	+88.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	-68.01%	+60.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.43%	54.39%	-46.96%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 16.80%, while Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a volatility of 35.69%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MQQQ	TSLQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.80%	35.69%	-18.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.57%	62.98%	-32.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.17%	89.70%	-52.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.45%	94.90%	-50.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.45%	94.90%	-50.45%

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.

Dividends

MQQQ vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than TSLQ's 10.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF	1.60%	2.02%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF	10.62%	10.56%	4.95%	13.35%	2.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MQQQ and TSLQ in my portfolio?

MQQQ and TSLQ have a correlation of -0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MQQQ or TSLQ?

TSLQ has higher volatility (35.69%) compared to MQQQ (16.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.

Which ETF is better, MQQQ or TSLQ?

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 49.32% vs -62.74% for TSLQ. On fees, TSLQ is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 16.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MQQQ or TSLQ?

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 49.32% return vs -62.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MQQQ or TSLQ?

TSLQ is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MQQQ or TSLQ?

TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.62%, compared with 1.60% for MQQQ.

What is the main difference between MQQQ and TSLQ?

MQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLQ is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: AXS and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 1.17% for TSLQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.