PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQQQ vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQQQ vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -20.71% return.


MQQQ

1D
1.03%
1M
20.59%
YTD
39.32%
6M
35.46%
1Y
83.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
3.94%
1M
14.75%
YTD
-20.71%
6M
-14.74%
1Y
8.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQQQ vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
39.32%31.67%-7.14%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
-20.71%-26.70%-16.81%

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and TSLG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2024

0.63

The correlation between MQQQ and TSLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQQQ vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MQQQTSLGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

0.09

+2.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

0.79

+2.28

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.10

+0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

0.12

+3.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.24

0.24

+12.00

MQQQ vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and TSLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MQQQTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

0.09

+2.50

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

-0.34

+1.67

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and TSLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQQQTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-82.86%

+40.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-54.61%

+29.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-59.94%

+59.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-58.72%

+51.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

26.54%

-19.54%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 8.50%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a volatility of 24.39%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQQQTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

24.39%

-15.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.50%

54.58%

-30.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.19%

92.55%

-60.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.26%

115.47%

-72.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.26%

115.47%

-72.21%

MQQQ vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MQQQ vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than TSLG's 8.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
1.45%2.02%0.02%
TSLG
Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF
8.26%6.55%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQQQ and TSLG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLG has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to MQQQ (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs TSLG's -82.86%.

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 83.05% vs 8.61% for TSLG. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 83.05% return vs 8.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.26%, compared with 1.45% for MQQQ.

They also come from different issuers: AXS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.75% for TSLG.

MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 0.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQQQ and TSLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer