PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQQQ vs. SARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQQQ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly higher than SARK's -8.86% return.


MQQQ

1D
1.03%
1M
20.59%
YTD
39.32%
6M
35.46%
1Y
83.05%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SARK

1D
1.58%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
-8.86%
6M
-7.57%
1Y
-36.06%
3Y*
-31.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQQQ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
39.32%31.67%19.72%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
-8.86%-25.93%-49.14%

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and SARK is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024

-0.76

The correlation between MQQQ and SARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SARK
SARK Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SARK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SARK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQQQ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MQQQSARKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.60

-1.01

+3.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

-1.43

+4.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.84

+0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

-0.91

+4.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.24

-1.22

+13.46

MQQQ vs. SARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the SARK Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and SARK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MQQQSARKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

-1.01

+3.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.33

-0.25

+1.58

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and SARK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQQQSARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-81.07%

+38.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-40.75%

+15.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-79.88%

+79.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-46.43%

+39.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.00%

30.38%

-23.38%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 8.50%, while Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQQQSARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

8.96%

-0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.50%

25.07%

-0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.19%

35.86%

-3.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.26%

56.25%

-12.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.26%

56.25%

-12.99%

MQQQ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MQQQ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than SARK's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
1.45%2.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
3.09%2.82%15.49%12.57%25.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQQQ and SARK have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SARK has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to MQQQ (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs SARK's -81.07%.

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 83.05% vs -36.06% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 83.05% return vs -36.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 1.45% for MQQQ.

MQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SARK is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.75% for SARK.

MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQQQ and SARK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer