MQQQ vs. SARK
MQQQ (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS. MQQQ is passively managed, while SARK is actively managed. Over the past year, MQQQ returned 39.63% vs -10.99% for SARK. Their -0.76 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. MQQQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
MQQQ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than SARK's 0.17% return.
MQQQ
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 39.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.13%
SARK
- 1D
- 2.38%
- 1M
- 13.13%
- 6M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 0.17%
- 1Y
- -10.99%
- 3Y*
- -24.59%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -11.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.75M | $11.55M | $17.50M | |
| $4.94M | $4.74M | $6.45M |
MQQQ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 17.07% | 31.67% | 16.76% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 0.17% | -25.93% | -44.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between MQQQ and SARK is -0.75, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2024 | -0.76 |
The correlation between MQQQ and SARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MQQQ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
MQQQ
SARK
MQQQ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MQQQ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.00 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | -0.23 | +1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | -0.38 | +4.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MQQQ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MQQQ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -81.07% | +38.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -26.34% | +1.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.97% | -77.89% | +61.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -47.53% | +40.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.24% | 15.44% | -7.20% |
Volatility
MQQQ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) has a higher volatility of 14.78% compared to Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) at 10.43%. This indicates that MQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MQQQ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.78% | 10.43% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.38% | 27.70% | +4.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.14% | 36.55% | +2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.75% | 55.75% | -11.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.75% | 55.75% | -11.00% |
MQQQ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MQQQ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than SARK's 2.81% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 1.72% | 2.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 2.81% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MQQQ and SARK have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MQQQ has higher volatility (14.78%) compared to SARK (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs SARK's -81.07%.
On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 39.63% vs -10.99% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SARK has been the lower-risk option at 10.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 39.63% return vs -10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.72% for MQQQ.
MQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SARK is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.75% for SARK.
MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MQQQ and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer