MQQQ vs. SARK
MQQQ (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while SARK is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by AXS. MQQQ is passively managed, while SARK is actively managed. Over the past year, MQQQ returned 83.05% vs -36.06% for SARK. At a correlation of -0.76, they often move in opposite directions. MQQQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
MQQQ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 39.32% return, which is significantly higher than SARK's -8.86% return.
MQQQ
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 20.59%
- YTD
- 39.32%
- 6M
- 35.46%
- 1Y
- 83.05%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -4.44%
- YTD
- -8.86%
- 6M
- -7.57%
- 1Y
- -36.06%
- 3Y*
- -31.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MQQQ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 39.32% | 31.67% | 19.72% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -8.86% | -25.93% | -49.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between MQQQ and SARK is -0.71, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | -0.76 |
The correlation between MQQQ and SARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MQQQ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
MQQQ
SARK
MQQQ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MQQQ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.60 | -1.01 | +3.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.07 | -1.43 | +4.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.84 | +0.56 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.40 | -0.91 | +4.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.24 | -1.22 | +13.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MQQQ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.60 | -1.01 | +3.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.33 | -0.25 | +1.58 |
Drawdowns
MQQQ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MQQQ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -81.07% | +38.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -40.75% | +15.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -79.88% | +79.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.18% | -46.43% | +39.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.00% | 30.38% | -23.38% |
Volatility
MQQQ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 8.50%, while Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MQQQ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 8.96% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.50% | 25.07% | -0.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.19% | 35.86% | -3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 56.25% | -12.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.26% | 56.25% | -12.99% |
MQQQ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MQQQ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than SARK's 3.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 1.45% | 2.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 3.09% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MQQQ and SARK have a correlation of -0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SARK has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to MQQQ (8.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs SARK's -81.07%.
On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 83.05% vs -36.06% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 83.05% return vs -36.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 1.45% for MQQQ.
MQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SARK is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.75% for SARK.
MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MQQQ and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer