PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQQQ vs. SARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQQQ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than SARK's 0.17% return.


MQQQ

1D
1.69%
1M
-7.53%
6M
15.18%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
39.63%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
36.13%

SARK

1D
2.38%
1M
13.13%
6M
-1.40%
YTD
0.17%
1Y
-10.99%
3Y*
-24.59%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$6.75M$11.55M$17.50M
$4.94M$4.74M$6.45M

MQQQ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
17.07%31.67%16.76%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
0.17%-25.93%-44.99%

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and SARK is -0.75, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2024

-0.76

The correlation between MQQQ and SARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

SARK
SARK Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
SARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SARK Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SARK Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MQQQ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MQQQSARKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.00

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.36

-0.23

+1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.17

-0.38

+4.55

MQQQ vs. SARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the SARK Sharpe Ratio of -0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and SARK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and SARK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQQQSARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-81.07%

+38.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-26.34%

+1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.97%

-77.89%

+61.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.39%

-47.53%

+40.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.24%

15.44%

-7.20%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) has a higher volatility of 14.78% compared to Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) at 10.43%. This indicates that MQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SARK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQQQSARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.78%

10.43%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.38%

27.70%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.14%

36.55%

+2.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.75%

55.75%

-11.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.75%

55.75%

-11.00%

MQQQ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

MQQQ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than SARK's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
1.72%2.02%0.02%0.00%0.00%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
2.81%2.82%15.49%12.57%25.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQQQ and SARK have a correlation of -0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MQQQ has higher volatility (14.78%) compared to SARK (10.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs SARK's -81.07%.

On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 39.63% vs -10.99% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, SARK has been the lower-risk option at 10.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 39.63% return vs -10.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

SARK has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 1.72% for MQQQ.

MQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SARK is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.75% for SARK.

MQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQQQ and SARK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer