MQQQ vs. RINC

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MQQQ (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF) and RINC (AXS Real Estate Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while RINC is a REIT fund tracking the Gapstow Real Estate Income Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MQQQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for RINC.

Performance

MQQQ vs. RINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MQQQ

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 20.59%
• YTD: 39.32%
• 6M: 35.46%
• 1Y: 83.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RINC

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQQQ vs. RINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF	39.32%	31.67%	19.72%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	0.00%	7.75%	-5.87%

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and RINC is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.24

The correlation between MQQQ and RINC shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. RINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQQQ

MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 68
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 65
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQQQ vs. RINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and AXS Real Estate Income ETF (RINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MQQQ	RINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.40	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.24	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MQQQ	RINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.33	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MQQQ	RINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.18%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.00%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MQQQ	RINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.50%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.50%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.19%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.26%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.26%	—	—

MQQQ vs. RINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than RINC's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

MQQQ vs. RINC - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than RINC's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF	1.45%	2.02%	0.02%	0.00%
RINC AXS Real Estate Income ETF	2.16%	6.04%	10.85%	3.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MQQQ and RINC in my portfolio?

MQQQ and RINC have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MQQQ or RINC?

On fees, RINC is cheaper at 0.89% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MQQQ or RINC?

RINC is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MQQQ or RINC?

RINC has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 1.45% for MQQQ.

What is the main difference between MQQQ and RINC?

MQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RINC is REIT. MQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while RINC tracks Gapstow Real Estate Income Index. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.89% for RINC.