MQQQ vs. NIOG
MQQQ (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF) and NIOG (Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - MQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%) while NIOG tracks the NIO Inc. (NIO). Both are passively managed. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. MQQQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NIOG.
Performance
MQQQ vs. NIOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than NIOG's -27.56% return.
MQQQ
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -7.53%
- 6M
- 15.18%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 39.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.13%
NIOG
- 1D
- 2.78%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- 6M
- -13.06%
- YTD
- -27.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.75M | $11.55M | $17.50M | |
| $119.34K | $154.91K | $404.59K |
MQQQ vs. NIOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 17.07% | 4.82% |
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | -27.56% | 3.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MQQQ and NIOG is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MQQQ vs. NIOG — Risk / Return Rank
MQQQ
NIOG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MQQQ vs. NIOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF (NIOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MQQQ | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.17 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MQQQ vs. NIOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum NIOG drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and NIOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MQQQ | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -61.79% | +19.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.97% | -54.61% | +38.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.39% | -27.99% | +20.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.24% | — | — |
Volatility
MQQQ vs. NIOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MQQQ | NIOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.38% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.14% | 109.44% | -70.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.75% | 109.44% | -64.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.75% | 109.44% | -64.69% |
MQQQ vs. NIOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NIOG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
MQQQ vs. NIOG - Dividend Comparison
MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, while NIOG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 1.72% | 2.02% | 0.02% |
NIOG Leverage Shares 2X Long NIO Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MQQQ and NIOG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NIOG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NIOG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.
MQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.72%, compared with 0.00% for NIOG.
MQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while NIOG tracks NIO Inc. (NIO). They also come from different issuers: AXS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.75% for NIOG.
Find the right allocation for MQQQ and NIOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer