PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MQQQ vs. MUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MQQQ vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MQQQ achieves a 25.95% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 575.80% return.


MQQQ

1D
-3.75%
1M
-3.01%
6M
21.12%
YTD
25.95%
1Y
49.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MUU

1D
-9.01%
1M
-18.36%
6M
372.65%
YTD
575.80%
1Y
2,796.55%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MQQQ vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
25.95%31.67%5.62%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
575.80%599.03%-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between MQQQ and MUU is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024

0.61

The correlation between MQQQ and MUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MQQQ vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MQQQ
MQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
MQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
MQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
MQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
MQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

MUU
MUU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MQQQ vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MQQQMUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-22.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.69

-0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

66.09

-64.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

221.31

-214.66

MQQQ vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MQQQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 23.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MQQQ and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MQQQ vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum MUU drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and MUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MQQQMUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.16%

-75.07%

+32.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.23%

-52.72%

+27.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.60%

-36.32%

+26.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.18%

-23.43%

+16.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.43%

16.57%

-9.14%

Volatility

MQQQ vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) is 16.80%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.81%. This indicates that MQQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MQQQMUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.80%

67.81%

-51.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.57%

116.35%

-85.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.17%

145.78%

-108.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.45%

138.10%

-93.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.45%

138.10%

-93.65%

MQQQ vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MQQQ vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, more than MUU's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
MQQQ
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF
1.60%2.02%0.02%
MUU
Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares
0.70%4.27%0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


MQQQ and MUU have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUU has higher volatility (67.81%) compared to MQQQ (16.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs MUU's -75.07%.

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 2796.55% vs 49.32% for MQQQ. On fees, MUU is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, MQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 16.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 2796.55% return vs 49.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MUU is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.

MQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.60%, compared with 0.70% for MUU.

MQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: AXS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 1.01% for MUU.

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (23.95 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MQQQ and MUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer