MQQQ vs. EINC
MQQQ (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, MQQQ returned 62.78% vs 29.82% for EINC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MQQQ charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
MQQQ vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MQQQ having a 27.22% return and EINC slightly lower at 25.97%.
MQQQ
- 1D
- -6.32%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 27.22%
- 6M
- 23.93%
- 1Y
- 62.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 1.37%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 25.98%
- 1Y
- 29.82%
- 3Y*
- 30.36%
- 5Y*
- 21.18%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
MQQQ vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 27.22% | 31.67% | 16.76% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 25.97% | 7.11% | 12.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MQQQ and EINC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2024 | 0.11 |
The correlation between MQQQ and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MQQQ vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
MQQQ
EINC
MQQQ vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MQQQ | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 3.80 | -1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.74 | 9.63 | -0.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MQQQ vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MQQQ drawdown since its inception was -42.16%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQQQ and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MQQQ | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.16% | -87.55% | +45.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.23% | -7.89% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.68% | -4.50% | -4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.16% | -44.15% | +36.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.20% | 3.10% | +4.10% |
Volatility
MQQQ vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF (MQQQ) has a higher volatility of 17.78% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.51%. This indicates that MQQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MQQQ | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.78% | 6.51% | +11.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.02% | 11.88% | +17.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.95% | 15.10% | +20.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.41% | 19.54% | +24.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.41% | 25.43% | +18.98% |
MQQQ vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
MQQQ has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
MQQQ vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
MQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than EINC's 3.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.51% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
MQQQ Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Monthly ETF | 1.58% | 2.02% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MQQQ and EINC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MQQQ has higher volatility (17.78%) compared to EINC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MQQQ dropped -42.16% vs EINC's -87.55%.
On 1-year performance, MQQQ leads with 62.78% vs 29.82% for EINC. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MQQQ has performed better with a 62.78% return vs 29.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for MQQQ.
EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 1.58% for MQQQ.
MQQQ is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. MQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: AXS and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for MQQQ and 0.45% for EINC.
EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MQQQ and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer