MQIFX vs. EMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Mutual Quest Fund (MQIFX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO).
MQIFX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Sep 25, 1980. EMO is an actively managed fund by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 10, 2011.
Performance
MQIFX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MQIFX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MQIFX Franklin Mutual Quest Fund | -0.94% | 17.66% | 8.84% | 10.46% | -6.85% | 11.50% | -1.84% | 12.40% | -7.33% | 6.99% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 20.88% | 7.38% | 44.45% | 31.76% | 40.13% | 74.70% | -64.47% | 19.60% | -25.73% | 0.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MQIFX achieves a -0.94% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 20.88% return. Over the past 10 years, MQIFX has underperformed EMO with an annualized return of 5.46%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.
MQIFX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 10.18%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 5.46%
EMO
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 23.15%
- 1Y
- 19.30%
- 3Y*
- 34.99%
- 5Y*
- 33.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MQIFX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MQIFX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MQIFX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank
MQIFX
EMO
MQIFX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Mutual Quest Fund (MQIFX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MQIFX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 0.91 | -0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.92 | 1.07 | -0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.50 | 3.23 | +0.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MQIFX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 0.91 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 1.25 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | 0.23 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.12 | +0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between MQIFX and EMO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MQIFX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison
MQIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, less than EMO's 8.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MQIFX Franklin Mutual Quest Fund | 4.22% | 4.18% | 5.10% | 4.60% | 3.80% | 2.59% | 3.66% | 3.52% | 13.76% | 4.53% | 1.24% | 5.75% |
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund | 8.11% | 9.41% | 7.16% | 6.79% | 6.71% | 6.71% | 15.82% | 10.94% | 16.39% | 10.85% | 9.76% | 11.88% |
Drawdowns
MQIFX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MQIFX drawdown since its inception was -34.60%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MQIFX and EMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MQIFX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.60% | -95.06% | +60.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -18.81% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.91% | -28.59% | +8.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.59% | -93.02% | +62.43% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.12% | -2.55% | -5.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -32.27% | +27.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.70% | 6.22% | -3.52% |
Volatility
MQIFX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Mutual Quest Fund (MQIFX) is 4.27%, while ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that MQIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MQIFX | EMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.27% | 4.63% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.26% | 11.12% | -3.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.37% | 21.39% | -9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.61% | 26.78% | -15.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.89% | 41.41% | -29.52% |