PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPXG.L vs. CP9G.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPXG.L vs. CP9G.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MPXG.L having a 2.88% return and CP9G.L slightly lower at 2.75%.


MPXG.L

1D
-0.35%
1M
-2.75%
YTD
2.88%
6M
2.63%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
4.17%
5Y*
10Y*

CP9G.L

1D
-0.65%
1M
-2.91%
YTD
2.75%
6M
2.32%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
1.98%
10Y*
5.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPXG.L vs. CP9G.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
MPXG.L
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
2.88%5.53%2.02%-1.23%1.81%
CP9G.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
2.75%5.89%0.85%-0.56%1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MPXG.L and CP9G.L is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2022

0.63

The correlation between MPXG.L and CP9G.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPXG.L vs. CP9G.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPXG.L
MPXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
MPXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
MPXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

CP9G.L
CP9G.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CP9G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPXG.L vs. CP9G.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L) and Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPXG.LCP9G.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.08

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

0.62

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.90

1.79

+0.11

MPXG.L vs. CP9G.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPXG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is comparable to the CP9G.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPXG.L and CP9G.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPXG.LCP9G.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

0.41

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.40

-0.12

Drawdowns

MPXG.L vs. CP9G.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPXG.L drawdown since its inception was -16.94%, smaller than the maximum CP9G.L drawdown of -32.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPXG.L and CP9G.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPXG.LCP9G.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.94%

-32.32%

+15.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.42%

-8.26%

+0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.75%

-15.80%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.39%

-5.28%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-6.04%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

2.88%

-0.04%

Volatility

MPXG.L vs. CP9G.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D) (MPXG.L) is 3.74%, while Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR (CP9G.L) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that MPXG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CP9G.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPXG.LCP9G.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.32%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.14%

10.45%

-1.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.41%

12.63%

-1.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.91%

13.91%

+1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.91%

15.70%

-0.79%

MPXG.L vs. CP9G.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPXG.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CP9G.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPXG.L vs. CP9G.L - Dividend Comparison

MPXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, while CP9G.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
CP9G.L
Amundi MSCI Pacific ex Japan UCITS DR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MPXG.L
Amundi Index MSCI Pacific ex Japan SRI PAB UCITS ETF DR GBP (D)
3.15%3.24%3.36%3.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPXG.L and CP9G.L have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MPXG.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MPXG.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CP9G.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for MPXG.L and 0.35% for CP9G.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPXG.L and CP9G.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer