MPWR vs. HUT
MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) and HUT (Hut 8 Corp.) are both stocks. MPWR operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while HUT operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, MPWR returned 30.08%/yr vs 46.15%/yr for HUT. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MPWR vs. HUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPWR achieves a 45.19% return, which is significantly lower than HUT's 167.78% return.
MPWR
- 1D
- -8.69%
- 1M
- -16.15%
- YTD
- 45.19%
- 6M
- 39.29%
- 1Y
- 79.79%
- 3Y*
- 36.12%
- 5Y*
- 30.08%
- 10Y*
- 35.87%
HUT
- 1D
- 4.54%
- 1M
- -1.45%
- YTD
- 167.78%
- 6M
- 147.82%
- 1Y
- 596.60%
- 3Y*
- 102.57%
- 5Y*
- 46.15%
- 10Y*
- —
MPWR vs. HUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 45.19% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -27.78% | 35.49% | 107.49% | 54.80% | -1.65% |
HUT Hut 8 Corp. | 167.78% | 124.21% | 53.60% | 213.88% | -89.17% | 185.45% | 250.63% | -25.02% | -70.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPWR and HUT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018 | 0.34 |
Fundamentals
MPWR:
$64.67B
HUT:
$13.66B
MPWR:
$13.89
HUT:
-$2.73
MPWR:
17.59
HUT:
9.90
MPWR:
$2.96B
HUT:
-$40.96M
MPWR:
$1.63B
HUT:
-$132.19M
MPWR:
$861.78M
HUT:
-$306.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPWR vs. HUT — Risk / Return Rank
MPWR
HUT
MPWR vs. HUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and Hut 8 Corp. (HUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MPWR | HUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.49 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.58 | 14.59 | -11.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.12 | 39.60 | -30.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MPWR vs. HUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPWR drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, smaller than the maximum HUT drawdown of -95.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPWR and HUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPWR | HUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -95.04% | +22.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.45% | -38.62% | +16.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.65% | -71.68% | +20.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.65% | -95.04% | +43.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.28% | -7.52% | -14.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.70% | -63.31% | +45.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.80% | 14.21% | -5.41% |
Volatility
MPWR vs. HUT - Volatility Comparison
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a higher volatility of 25.17% compared to Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) at 23.49%. This indicates that MPWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HUT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPWR | HUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.17% | 23.49% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.34% | 71.40% | -30.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.99% | 102.49% | -51.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.10% | 105.53% | -51.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.52% | 114.53% | -67.01% |
Dividends
MPWR vs. HUT - Dividend Comparison
MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, while HUT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HUT Hut 8 Corp. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.51% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
Financials
MPWR vs. HUT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Hut 8 Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MPWR and HUT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MPWR has higher volatility (25.17%) compared to HUT (23.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPWR dropped -72.27% vs HUT's -95.04%.
HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.51 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPWR and HUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer