MPWR vs. ECO
MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) and ECO (Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp) are both stocks. MPWR operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while ECO operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past year, MPWR returned 101.90% vs 185.56% for ECO. Their 0.10 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MPWR vs. ECO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPWR achieves a 57.89% return, which is significantly lower than ECO's 90.59% return.
MPWR
- 1D
- 8.35%
- 1M
- 7.08%
- 6M
- 27.30%
- YTD
- 57.89%
- 1Y
- 101.90%
- 3Y*
- 38.39%
- 5Y*
- 26.91%
- 10Y*
- 36.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 27.19%
ECO
- 1D
- 0.79%
- 1M
- 20.80%
- 6M
- 59.28%
- YTD
- 90.59%
- 1Y
- 185.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 48.73%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.81M | $22.75M | $24.38M | |
| $1.37B | $1.27B | $1.35B |
MPWR vs. ECO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 57.89% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 11.13% |
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 90.59% | 71.94% | -11.70% | -1.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPWR and ECO is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2023 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
MPWR:
$70.06B
ECO:
$1.97B
MPWR:
$16.33
ECO:
$5.73
MPWR:
87.33
ECO:
10.53
MPWR:
1.10
ECO:
1.00
MPWR:
21.32
ECO:
4.35
MPWR:
18.03
ECO:
3.17
MPWR:
$3.27B
ECO:
$481.57M
MPWR:
$1.81B
ECO:
$274.61M
MPWR:
$1.01B
ECO:
$284.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPWR vs. ECO — Risk / Return Rank
MPWR
ECO
MPWR vs. ECO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MPWR | ECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.55 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 10.57 | -6.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.44 | 29.65 | -20.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MPWR vs. ECO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPWR drawdown since its inception was -72.27%, which is greater than ECO's maximum drawdown of -46.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPWR and ECO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPWR | ECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.27% | -46.15% | -26.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.99% | -17.66% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.49% | 0.00% | -15.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -14.58% | -3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.83% | 6.29% | +4.54% |
Volatility
MPWR vs. ECO - Volatility Comparison
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a higher volatility of 18.57% compared to Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp (ECO) at 13.44%. This indicates that MPWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ECO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPWR | ECO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.57% | 13.44% | +5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 44.07% | 31.16% | +12.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.05% | 41.51% | +12.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 54.63% | 42.20% | +12.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.86% | 42.20% | +5.66% |
Dividends
MPWR vs. ECO - Dividend Comparison
MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than ECO's 8.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ECO Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp | 8.29% | 6.26% | 15.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
Financials
MPWR vs. ECO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MPWR vs. ECO - Profitability Comparison
MPWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 541.07M and revenue of 980.64M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.
ECO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a gross profit of 109.68M and revenue of 170.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.
MPWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 303.89M and revenue of 980.64M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.
ECO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported an operating income of 98.06M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.6%.
MPWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 257.30M and revenue of 980.64M, resulting in a net margin of 26.2%.
ECO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Okeanis Eco Tankers Corp reported a net income of 88.32M and revenue of 170.17M, resulting in a net margin of 51.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MPWR and ECO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MPWR has higher volatility (18.57%) compared to ECO (13.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPWR dropped -72.27% vs ECO's -46.15%.
ECO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.51 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MPWR and ECO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer