MPRO vs. DWAT
MPRO (Monarch ProCap ETF) and DWAT (Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MPRO is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the Monarch ProCap Index, while DWAT is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Arrow Funds. MPRO is passively managed, while DWAT is actively managed. MPRO charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.83%/yr for DWAT.
Performance
MPRO vs. DWAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
MPRO
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.89%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 12.85%
- 3Y*
- 9.93%
- 5Y*
- 5.46%
- 10Y*
- —
DWAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MPRO vs. DWAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 1.59% |
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% |
MPRO vs. DWAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MPRO
DWAT
Communication Services
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
MPRO
DWAT
Healthcare
MPRO
DWAT
Technology
MPRO
DWAT
Consumer Cyclical
MPRO
DWAT
Real Estate
MPRO
DWAT
Financial Services
MPRO
DWAT
Consumer Defensive
MPRO
DWAT
Industrials
MPRO
DWAT
Basic Materials
MPRO
-
DWAT
Energy
MPRO
-
DWAT
Utilities
MPRO
-
DWAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPRO vs. DWAT — Risk / Return Rank
MPRO
DWAT
MPRO vs. DWAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monarch ProCap ETF (MPRO) and Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF (DWAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPRO | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.99 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPRO | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | — | — |
Drawdowns
MPRO vs. DWAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPRO drawdown since its inception was -14.51%, which is greater than DWAT's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPRO and DWAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPRO | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.51% | 0.00% | -14.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.67% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.87% | 0.00% | -0.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | 0.00% | -3.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.43% | — | — |
Volatility
MPRO vs. DWAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPRO | DWAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.02% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.64% | 0.00% | +6.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 0.00% | +9.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.22% | 0.00% | +9.22% |
MPRO vs. DWAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPRO has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAT's 1.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
MPRO vs. DWAT - Dividend Comparison
MPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, while DWAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAT Arrow DWA Tactical: Macro ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MPRO Monarch ProCap ETF | 1.88% | 1.93% | 1.64% | 1.40% | 1.09% | 0.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, MPRO is cheaper at 1.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MPRO is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.83% for DWAT.
MPRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.88%, compared with 0.00% for DWAT.
MPRO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while DWAT is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Monarch and Arrow Funds. Their fees differ too: 1.17% for MPRO and 1.83% for DWAT.
Find the right allocation for MPRO and DWAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer