PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPMCX vs. FSMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPMCX vs. FSMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund (MPMCX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPMCX achieves a 5.08% return, which is significantly lower than FSMAX's 15.03% return. Over the past 10 years, MPMCX has outperformed FSMAX with an annualized return of 13.43%, while FSMAX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.08% annualized return.


MPMCX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
5.08%
6M
-0.50%
1Y
6.73%
3Y*
23.23%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
13.43%

FSMAX

1D
1.14%
1M
3.25%
YTD
15.03%
6M
13.25%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
6.78%
10Y*
12.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPMCX vs. FSMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPMCX
BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund
5.08%3.40%49.81%18.30%-18.35%19.07%22.87%30.77%-9.17%18.68%
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
15.03%11.40%16.99%25.36%-26.44%12.41%32.28%28.01%-9.44%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MPMCX and FSMAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.96

The correlation between MPMCX and FSMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPMCX vs. FSMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPMCX
MPMCX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
MPMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MPMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMAX
FSMAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FSMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPMCX vs. FSMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund (MPMCX) and Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPMCXFSMAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.30

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.83

2.95

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.80

10.43

-7.63

MPMCX vs. FSMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPMCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FSMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPMCX and FSMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPMCXFSMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

1.76

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.31

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.40

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.46

-0.05

Drawdowns

MPMCX vs. FSMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than FSMAX's maximum drawdown of -50.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPMCX and FSMAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPMCXFSMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-50.55%

-4.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.24%

-10.26%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

-26.82%

+7.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.80%

-36.31%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.74%

-50.55%

+11.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.94%

0.00%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.02%

-12.16%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.90%

+0.15%

Volatility

MPMCX vs. FSMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund (MPMCX) is 2.30%, while Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund (FSMAX) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that MPMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPMCXFSMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

4.81%

-2.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.72%

12.52%

-0.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.56%

17.19%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.40%

22.33%

+1.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.97%

30.23%

-8.26%

MPMCX vs. FSMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPMCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMAX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPMCX vs. FSMAX - Dividend Comparison

MPMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 531.29%, more than FSMAX's 0.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSMAX
Fidelity Extended Market Index Fund
0.50%0.57%0.48%1.17%1.90%7.49%2.14%4.30%6.09%5.44%4.85%6.34%
MPMCX
BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund
531.29%558.31%53.86%15.92%13.31%13.10%7.73%3.36%8.53%4.69%1.71%4.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPMCX and FSMAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSMAX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to MPMCX (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPMCX dropped -55.25% vs FSMAX's -50.55%.

FSMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPMCX and FSMAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer