MPMCX vs. CTIGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

MPMCX (BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund) and CTIGX (Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MPMCX charges 0.90%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for CTIGX.

Performance

MPMCX vs. CTIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund (MPMCX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

MPMCX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

CTIGX

• 1D: 3.61%
• 1M: -9.09%
• 6M: 13.72%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 1Y: 33.66%
• 3Y*: 25.27%
• 5Y*: 7.68%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

MPMCX vs. CTIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MPMCX BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund	5.08%	3.40%	49.81%	18.30%	-18.35%	19.07%	22.87%	4.66%
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund	13.72%	21.21%	44.09%	12.26%	-34.88%	7.64%	58.94%	-3.80%

Correlation

The correlation between MPMCX and CTIGX is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.77
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2019	0.83

The correlation between MPMCX and CTIGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

MPMCX vs. CTIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MPMCX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CTIGX

CTIGX Risk / Return Rank: 43
CTIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
CTIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
CTIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
CTIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CTIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MPMCX vs. CTIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund (MPMCX) and Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund (CTIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MPMCX	CTIGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.10	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.61	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.20	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.90	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	7.98	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	MPMCX	CTIGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-46.26%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.30%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-13.83%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-18.30%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MPMCX	CTIGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	9.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	23.84%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	29.20%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	27.53%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	29.28%	—

MPMCX vs. CTIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPMCX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CTIGX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

MPMCX vs. CTIGX - Dividend Comparison

MPMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 531.29%, more than CTIGX's 4.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CTIGX Calamos Timpani SMID Growth Fund	4.03%	4.59%	2.80%	0.00%	0.00%	11.76%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MPMCX BNY Mellon Mid Cap Multi-Strategy Fund	531.29%	558.31%	53.86%	15.92%	13.31%	13.10%	7.73%	3.36%	8.53%	4.69%	1.71%	4.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPMCX and CTIGX in my portfolio?

MPMCX and CTIGX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.