MPLY vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MPLY (Monopoly ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MPLY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Strategy Shares, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. MPLY is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past year, MPLY returned 21.67% vs 29.82% for EINC. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. MPLY charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

MPLY vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Monopoly ETF (MPLY) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPLY achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.

MPLY

• 1D: -1.60%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 2.78%
• 6M: 1.93%
• 1Y: 21.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 25.97%
• 6M: 25.98%
• 1Y: 29.82%
• 3Y*: 30.36%
• 5Y*: 21.18%
• 10Y*: 12.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPLY vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MPLY Monopoly ETF	2.78%	20.65%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	25.97%	2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between MPLY and EINC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

MPLY vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPLY

MPLY Risk / Return Rank: 39
MPLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
MPLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
MPLY Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MPLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
MPLY Martin Ratio Rank: 40

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 64
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPLY vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Monopoly ETF (MPLY) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MPLY	EINC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.36	1.99	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.89	2.67	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	3.80	-2.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.17	9.63	-3.46

MPLY vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPLY Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPLY and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MPLY vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPLY drawdown since its inception was -13.46%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPLY and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	MPLY	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.46%	-87.55%	+74.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.46%	-7.89%	-5.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.95%	-4.50%	-2.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.13%	-44.15%	+42.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.52%	3.10%	+0.42%

Volatility

MPLY vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Monopoly ETF (MPLY) is 6.11%, while VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that MPLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MPLY	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	6.51%	-0.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.61%	11.88%	+0.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.02%	15.10%	+0.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.75%	19.54%	-3.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.75%	25.43%	-9.68%

MPLY vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPLY has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

MPLY vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

MPLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than EINC's 3.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.51%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%
MPLY Monopoly ETF	0.13%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MPLY and EINC in my portfolio?

MPLY and EINC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MPLY or EINC?

EINC has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to MPLY (6.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPLY dropped -13.46% vs EINC's -87.55%.

Which ETF is better, MPLY or EINC?

On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 29.82% vs 21.67% for MPLY. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, MPLY has been the lower-risk option at 6.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MPLY or EINC?

Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 29.82% return vs 21.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MPLY or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MPLY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MPLY or EINC?

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.13% for MPLY.

What is the main difference between MPLY and EINC?

MPLY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Strategy Shares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for MPLY and 0.45% for EINC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.