PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPC vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPC vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPC achieves a 65.66% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's 61.91% return. Over the past 10 years, MPC has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 26.22%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 44.95% annualized return.


MPC

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.90%
YTD
65.66%
6M
41.68%
1Y
73.48%
3Y*
37.73%
5Y*
36.41%
10Y*
26.22%

TQQQ

1D
-1.55%
1M
26.46%
YTD
61.91%
6M
54.01%
1Y
132.34%
3Y*
68.49%
5Y*
27.97%
10Y*
44.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPC vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
65.66%19.17%-4.06%30.46%86.62%61.00%-27.38%6.05%-8.23%34.78%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
61.91%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between MPC and TQQQ is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2011

0.34

The correlation between MPC and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPC vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPC
MPC Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
MPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
MPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPC vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPCTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.39

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

3.60

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.65

11.77

-1.12

MPC vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPC Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPC and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPCTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.80

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

0.42

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

0.68

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.74

-0.17

Drawdowns

MPC vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPC drawdown since its inception was -79.67%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPC and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPCTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.67%

-81.66%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.33%

-36.97%

+18.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.75%

-58.04%

+13.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.75%

-81.66%

+36.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.67%

-81.66%

+1.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.06%

-2.29%

+2.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-18.52%

+1.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.92%

11.28%

-4.36%

Volatility

MPC vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Marathon Petroleum Corporation (MPC) is 10.91%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that MPC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPCTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.91%

13.35%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.73%

36.04%

-10.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.45%

47.60%

-16.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.04%

66.50%

-33.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.26%

65.95%

-25.69%

Dividends

MPC vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

MPC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, more than TQQQ's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPC
Marathon Petroleum Corporation
1.46%2.29%2.43%2.07%2.14%3.63%5.61%3.52%3.12%2.30%2.70%2.20%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.37%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPC and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.35%) compared to MPC (10.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPC dropped -79.67% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPC and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer