MPAY.TO vs. USCL.TO
MPAY.TO (Global X Mid-Term U.S. Treasury Premium Yield ETF) and USCL.TO (Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MPAY.TO is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Global X, while USCL.TO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MPAY.TO returned 6.63% vs 29.89% for USCL.TO. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MPAY.TO charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for USCL.TO.
Performance
MPAY.TO vs. USCL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MPAY.TO achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than USCL.TO's 11.57% return.
MPAY.TO
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCL.TO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 11.57%
- 6M
- 9.93%
- 1Y
- 29.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MPAY.TO vs. USCL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MPAY.TO Global X Mid-Term U.S. Treasury Premium Yield ETF | 2.37% | 0.18% | 7.40% | 3.78% |
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.57% | 10.03% | 38.54% | 4.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between MPAY.TO and USCL.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2023 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MPAY.TO vs. USCL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MPAY.TO
USCL.TO
MPAY.TO vs. USCL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Mid-Term U.S. Treasury Premium Yield ETF (MPAY.TO) and Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MPAY.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.49 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 3.51 | -2.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.14 | 14.29 | -11.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MPAY.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 2.55 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.74 | 1.42 | -0.68 |
Drawdowns
MPAY.TO vs. USCL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MPAY.TO drawdown since its inception was -7.95%, smaller than the maximum USCL.TO drawdown of -21.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPAY.TO and USCL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MPAY.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.95% | -21.85% | +13.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.88% | -8.56% | +3.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.43% | -0.08% | -1.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -2.55% | +0.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 2.10% | +0.02% |
Volatility
MPAY.TO vs. USCL.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Mid-Term U.S. Treasury Premium Yield ETF (MPAY.TO) is 1.80%, while Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (USCL.TO) has a volatility of 2.86%. This indicates that MPAY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USCL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MPAY.TO | USCL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.80% | 2.86% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.41% | 9.31% | -4.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.84% | 11.79% | -5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 15.44% | -8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.03% | 15.44% | -8.41% |
MPAY.TO vs. USCL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
MPAY.TO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than USCL.TO's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MPAY.TO vs. USCL.TO - Dividend Comparison
MPAY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.73%, less than USCL.TO's 11.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MPAY.TO Global X Mid-Term U.S. Treasury Premium Yield ETF | 8.73% | 9.21% | 9.12% | 2.21% |
USCL.TO Global X Enhanced S&P 500 Covered Call ETF | 11.95% | 12.94% | 11.57% | 7.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MPAY.TO and USCL.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USCL.TO is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USCL.TO is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for MPAY.TO.
MPAY.TO is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while USCL.TO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for MPAY.TO and 0.04% for USCL.TO.
Find the right allocation for MPAY.TO and USCL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer