PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPAIX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPAIX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio (MPAIX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPAIX achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 26.34% return. Over the past 10 years, MPAIX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 12.22%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.07% annualized return.


MPAIX

1D
-2.33%
1M
3.99%
YTD
-2.26%
6M
-4.73%
1Y
0.98%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
12.22%

FTQGX

1D
1.30%
1M
10.43%
YTD
26.34%
6M
25.73%
1Y
52.54%
3Y*
30.42%
5Y*
16.78%
10Y*
19.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPAIX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPAIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio
-2.26%18.96%36.20%46.28%-54.25%-4.91%74.81%29.09%2.07%32.08%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
26.34%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between MPAIX and FTQGX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2008

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between MPAIX and FTQGX has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPAIX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPAIX
MPAIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
MPAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MPAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPAIX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio (MPAIX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPAIXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.46

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

4.24

-4.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

18.25

-18.11

MPAIX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPAIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPAIX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPAIXFTQGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

2.72

-2.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.78

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.89

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.51

-0.07

Drawdowns

MPAIX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPAIX drawdown since its inception was -64.09%, roughly equal to the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPAIX and FTQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPAIXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.09%

-61.29%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-12.76%

-11.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.15%

-26.84%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.09%

-32.31%

-31.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.09%

-32.31%

-31.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.31%

0.00%

-12.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.53%

-14.19%

+0.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.64%

2.96%

+8.68%

Volatility

MPAIX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio (MPAIX) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) at 7.14%. This indicates that MPAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPAIXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

7.14%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.32%

15.42%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.54%

19.91%

+4.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.55%

21.67%

+13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.54%

21.57%

+7.97%

MPAIX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPAIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than FTQGX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPAIX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

MPAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than FTQGX's 9.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
9.85%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%
MPAIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio
0.03%0.03%1.50%0.00%28.33%23.18%5.16%3.77%4.54%7.43%2.17%8.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPAIX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPAIX has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to FTQGX (7.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPAIX dropped -64.09% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPAIX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer