PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPAIX vs. TRLGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPAIX vs. TRLGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio (MPAIX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPAIX achieves a -2.26% return, which is significantly lower than TRLGX's 5.12% return. Over the past 10 years, MPAIX has underperformed TRLGX with an annualized return of 12.22%, while TRLGX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.44% annualized return.


MPAIX

1D
-2.33%
1M
3.99%
YTD
-2.26%
6M
-4.73%
1Y
0.98%
3Y*
21.21%
5Y*
0.66%
10Y*
12.22%

TRLGX

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.03%
YTD
5.12%
6M
4.79%
1Y
20.79%
3Y*
25.39%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
18.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPAIX vs. TRLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPAIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio
-2.26%18.96%36.20%46.28%-54.25%-4.91%74.81%29.09%2.07%32.08%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
5.12%17.51%37.57%46.22%-35.26%23.24%39.57%28.51%4.35%37.77%

Correlation

The correlation between MPAIX and TRLGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2008

0.86

The correlation between MPAIX and TRLGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPAIX vs. TRLGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPAIX
MPAIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
MPAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
MPAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TRLGX
TRLGX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TRLGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRLGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRLGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRLGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRLGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPAIX vs. TRLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio (MPAIX) and T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPAIXTRLGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.24

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

1.19

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.14

3.75

-3.60

MPAIX vs. TRLGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPAIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the TRLGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPAIX and TRLGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPAIXTRLGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

1.38

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.58

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.85

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.58

-0.14

Drawdowns

MPAIX vs. TRLGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPAIX drawdown since its inception was -64.09%, which is greater than TRLGX's maximum drawdown of -55.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPAIX and TRLGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPAIXTRLGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.09%

-55.56%

-8.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.41%

-18.18%

-6.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.15%

-21.17%

-5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.09%

-40.44%

-23.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.09%

-40.44%

-23.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.31%

-0.90%

-11.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.53%

-8.68%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.64%

5.72%

+5.92%

Volatility

MPAIX vs. TRLGX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio (MPAIX) has a higher volatility of 7.65% compared to T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund (TRLGX) at 3.27%. This indicates that MPAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPAIXTRLGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

3.27%

+4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.32%

12.35%

+6.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.54%

15.59%

+8.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.55%

22.38%

+13.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.54%

21.76%

+7.78%

MPAIX vs. TRLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPAIX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than TRLGX's 0.55% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPAIX vs. TRLGX - Dividend Comparison

MPAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, less than TRLGX's 13.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MPAIX
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Advantage Portfolio
0.03%0.03%1.50%0.00%28.33%23.18%5.16%3.77%4.54%7.43%2.17%8.89%
TRLGX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Growth Fund
13.02%13.69%9.80%2.04%3.88%2.56%0.42%4.09%7.93%9.27%1.64%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPAIX and TRLGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPAIX has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to TRLGX (3.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPAIX dropped -64.09% vs TRLGX's -55.56%.

TRLGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.38 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPAIX and TRLGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer