PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MPA vs. BDMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MPA vs. BDMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MPA achieves a 3.87% return, which is significantly lower than BDMIX's 12.48% return. Over the past 10 years, MPA has underperformed BDMIX with an annualized return of 1.81%, while BDMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.39% annualized return.


MPA

1D
-0.62%
1M
0.91%
YTD
3.87%
6M
2.19%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
5.20%
5Y*
-1.34%
10Y*
1.81%

BDMIX

1D
0.43%
1M
5.33%
YTD
12.48%
6M
15.59%
1Y
21.79%
3Y*
21.82%
5Y*
12.93%
10Y*
8.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MPA vs. BDMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
3.87%1.82%6.23%9.67%-31.00%17.06%9.14%18.87%-8.00%7.22%
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
12.48%18.30%21.39%14.55%1.80%3.34%0.29%-0.85%2.20%12.85%

Correlation

The correlation between MPA and BDMIX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MPA vs. BDMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MPA
MPA Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
MPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
MPA Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
MPA Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

BDMIX
BDMIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
BDMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
BDMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MPA vs. BDMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) and BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MPABDMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.61

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

6.14

-4.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.56

17.41

-10.85

MPA vs. BDMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MPA Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the BDMIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MPA and BDMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MPABDMIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

3.19

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.11

1.99

-2.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

1.45

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

1.24

-0.87

Drawdowns

MPA vs. BDMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MPA drawdown since its inception was -44.78%, which is greater than BDMIX's maximum drawdown of -11.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MPA and BDMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MPABDMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.78%

-11.89%

-32.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.42%

-3.54%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.25%

-4.07%

-11.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.10%

-6.15%

-31.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.10%

-9.44%

-28.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.34%

0.00%

-17.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-2.68%

-7.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.62%

1.26%

+0.36%

Volatility

MPA vs. BDMIX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund (MPA) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I (BDMIX) at 1.94%. This indicates that MPA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MPABDMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.56%

1.94%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.24%

4.45%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.12%

6.83%

+1.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.11%

6.52%

+5.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.32%

5.81%

+6.51%

MPA vs. BDMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MPA has a 2.28% expense ratio, which is higher than BDMIX's 1.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

MPA vs. BDMIX - Dividend Comparison

MPA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.05%, less than BDMIX's 7.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BDMIX
BlackRock Global Long/Short Equity Fund Class I
7.94%8.94%13.26%7.42%0.00%1.23%0.30%6.78%0.94%0.00%0.00%1.86%
MPA
BlackRock MuniYield Pennsylvania Quality Fund
6.05%6.98%6.02%3.63%5.60%3.94%4.12%4.16%5.40%5.22%5.56%5.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


MPA and BDMIX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MPA has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to BDMIX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MPA dropped -44.78% vs BDMIX's -11.89%.

BDMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MPA and BDMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer